Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4450

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:45, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4450_brain_hippocampus_amygdala_spinal_corpus_thalamus_globus



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr5:11589158..11589169,-p25@CTNND2
Hg19::chr7:31092040..31092051,+p7@ADCYAP1R1
Hg19::chrX:13917521..13917525,-p@chrX:13917521..13917525
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0007158neuron adhesion0.0248690319985808
GO:0004999vasoactive intestinal polypeptide receptor activity0.0248690319985808



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
embryonic stem cell8.86e-075
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube1.48e-8456
neural rod1.48e-8456
future spinal cord1.48e-8456
neural keel1.48e-8456
central nervous system1.59e-8081
regional part of nervous system1.51e-7453
regional part of brain1.51e-7453
nervous system1.09e-7189
brain9.32e-7168
future brain9.32e-7168
neural plate1.14e-6182
presumptive neural plate1.14e-6182
regional part of forebrain2.39e-6041
forebrain2.39e-6041
anterior neural tube2.39e-6041
future forebrain2.39e-6041
neurectoderm2.08e-5886
telencephalon8.88e-5834
brain grey matter9.35e-5834
gray matter9.35e-5834
cerebral hemisphere3.13e-5132
regional part of telencephalon3.21e-5132
ecto-epithelium8.28e-47104
pre-chordal neural plate9.07e-4561
adult organism2.90e-42114
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest3.06e-39132
regional part of cerebral cortex4.10e-3922
neocortex1.43e-3720
ectoderm-derived structure5.20e-35171
ectoderm5.20e-35171
presumptive ectoderm5.20e-35171
cerebral cortex3.88e-3425
pallium3.88e-3425
organ system subdivision1.95e-27223
basal ganglion4.51e-279
nuclear complex of neuraxis4.51e-279
aggregate regional part of brain4.51e-279
collection of basal ganglia4.51e-279
cerebral subcortex4.51e-279
neural nucleus1.13e-269
nucleus of brain1.13e-269
posterior neural tube3.87e-2415
chordal neural plate3.87e-2415
tube6.13e-20192
telencephalic nucleus1.27e-197
brainstem4.62e-166
gyrus9.79e-166
segmental subdivision of hindbrain7.86e-1512
hindbrain7.86e-1512
presumptive hindbrain7.86e-1512
anatomical conduit3.47e-14240
anatomical cluster4.03e-14373
temporal lobe7.09e-146
segmental subdivision of nervous system1.30e-1313
limbic system1.57e-135
spinal cord7.75e-133
dorsal region element7.75e-133
dorsum7.75e-133
occipital lobe2.68e-125
pons3.92e-123
organ part5.36e-11218
epithelium8.94e-11306
cell layer1.39e-10309
regional part of metencephalon2.12e-109
metencephalon2.12e-109
future metencephalon2.12e-109
amygdala2.26e-092
globus pallidus3.00e-092
pallidum3.00e-092
corpus striatum4.37e-094
striatum4.37e-094
ventral part of telencephalon4.37e-094
future corpus striatum4.37e-094
locus ceruleus6.59e-092
brainstem nucleus6.59e-092
hindbrain nucleus6.59e-092
dorsal plus ventral thalamus8.00e-092
thalamic complex8.00e-092
middle temporal gyrus1.27e-082
multi-tissue structure1.58e-08342
parietal lobe2.09e-075
embryo2.76e-07592


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.