Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2802

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:43, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2802_esophagus_Prostate_biphenotypic_cervical_tonsil_Smooth_anaplastic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr5:134364600..134364638,-p@chr5:134364600..134364638
-
Hg19::chr5:134364906..134364931,-p@chr5:134364906..134364931
-
Hg19::chr5:134364965..134364981,-p@chr5:134364965..134364981
-
Hg19::chr5:134369879..134369898,-p2@PITX1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
endo-epithelial cell1.93e-1242
endodermal cell1.61e-1058
epithelial cell7.88e-10253
epithelial cell of alimentary canal8.01e-0820
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
digestive system1.39e-23145
digestive tract1.39e-23145
primitive gut1.39e-23145
subdivision of digestive tract5.69e-23118
endoderm-derived structure6.24e-23160
endoderm6.24e-23160
presumptive endoderm6.24e-23160
orifice5.26e-1836
respiratory system3.39e-1474
hindgut3.29e-1119
oral opening2.74e-1022
foregut1.35e-0987
respiratory tract1.78e-0954
segment of respiratory tract1.87e-0947
cloaca2.89e-0914
anal region2.89e-0914
embryonic cloaca2.89e-0914
terminal part of digestive tract2.89e-0914
primitive urogenital sinus2.89e-0914
proctodeum2.89e-0914
prostate gland1.44e-0811
male accessory sex gland1.44e-0811
embryonic cloacal epithelium1.44e-0811
epithelium of hindgut1.44e-0811
urogenital sinus epithelium1.44e-0811
prostate bud1.44e-0811
prostate field1.44e-0811
mouth1.83e-0829
stomodeum1.83e-0829
genitourinary system2.11e-0815
intestine2.43e-0817
larynx2.49e-089
respiratory primordium5.71e-0838
endoderm of foregut5.71e-0838
male organism6.10e-0822
male reproductive system6.10e-0822
saliva-secreting gland1.05e-076
gland of oral region1.05e-076
gland of foregut1.05e-076
oral gland1.05e-076
oral cavity1.05e-076
sex gland1.30e-0712
male reproductive gland1.30e-0712
organ system subdivision1.34e-07223
upper respiratory tract6.97e-0719
large intestine8.12e-0711
multi-tissue structure9.35e-07342
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma2.63e-11106
cancer4.24e-11235
disease of cellular proliferation2.26e-10239
cell type cancer2.76e-09143


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTBP2#1488347.03775025449611.60047699357395e-050.000370461473253258
SUZ12#23512337.58683568329723.12785741999833e-050.000632224310213287



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.