Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:651

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:41, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:46171532..46171533,-p@chr11:46171532..46171533
-
Mm9::chr14:54218500..54218530,+p1@uc007tss.1
Mm9::chr14:54254496..54254506,+p1@ENSMUST00000103658
Mm9::chr14:54303268..54303275,+p1@ENSMUST00000103663
Mm9::chr14:54336355..54336381,+p1@ENSMUST00000103666
Mm9::chr14:54357978..54357982,+p1@ENSMUST00000171355
Mm9::chr14:54426138..54426147,+p2@ENSMUST00000103672
p2@uc007tto.1
Mm9::chr14:54843637..54843647,+p@chr14:54843637..54843647
+
Mm9::chr1:60825052..60825056,+p@chr1:60825052..60825056
+
Mm9::chr1:60828457..60828460,+p@chr1:60828457..60828460
+
Mm9::chr5:123439251..123439261,+p9@ENSMUST00000148466
p9@uc008zmw.1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
mature alpha-beta T cell1.63e-309
alpha-beta T cell1.63e-309
immature T cell1.63e-309
mature T cell1.63e-309
immature alpha-beta T cell1.63e-309
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell4.14e-278
T cell1.04e-2411
pro-T cell1.04e-2411
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.57e-2212
thymocyte8.08e-216
double negative thymocyte8.08e-216
naive T cell8.08e-216
double-positive, alpha-beta thymocyte8.08e-216
CD4-positive, alpha-beta thymocyte8.08e-216
naive thymus-derived CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell8.08e-216
DN4 thymocyte8.08e-216
DN1 thymic pro-T cell8.08e-216
DN2 thymocyte8.08e-216
DN3 thymocyte8.08e-216
immature single positive thymocyte8.08e-216
early T lineage precursor8.08e-216
mature CD4 single-positive thymocyte8.08e-216
resting double-positive thymocyte8.08e-216
double-positive blast8.08e-216
CD69-positive double-positive thymocyte8.08e-216
CD69-positive, CD4-positive single-positive thymocyte8.08e-216
CD4-positive, CD8-intermediate double-positive thymocyte8.08e-216
CD24-positive, CD4 single-positive thymocyte8.08e-216
lymphocyte1.10e-2013
common lymphoid progenitor1.10e-2013
nucleate cell1.55e-1616
leukocyte1.78e-1517
nongranular leukocyte1.78e-1517
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell7.11e-1525
hematopoietic cell3.46e-1132
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell3.46e-1132
hematopoietic stem cell3.46e-1132
angioblastic mesenchymal cell3.46e-1132
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell3.46e-1132
connective tissue cell3.47e-0746
mesenchymal cell3.47e-0746

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemopoietic organ1.08e-4429
immune organ1.08e-4429
thymus2.08e-4123
neck2.08e-4123
respiratory system epithelium2.08e-4123
hemolymphoid system gland2.08e-4123
pharyngeal epithelium2.08e-4123
thymic region2.08e-4123
pharyngeal gland2.08e-4123
entire pharyngeal arch endoderm2.08e-4123
thymus primordium2.08e-4123
early pharyngeal endoderm2.08e-4123
pharynx1.51e-3924
gland of gut1.51e-3924
upper respiratory tract1.51e-3924
chordate pharynx1.51e-3924
pharyngeal arch system1.51e-3924
pharyngeal region of foregut1.51e-3924
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure2.09e-3635
segment of respiratory tract8.57e-3527
hemolymphoid system2.17e-3448
immune system2.17e-3448
hematopoietic system1.59e-3345
blood island1.59e-3345
organ segment4.31e-2635
craniocervical region2.83e-2536
respiratory tract8.65e-2241
respiratory system3.42e-2142
anterior region of body1.27e-2043
lateral plate mesoderm2.03e-1587
gut epithelium2.15e-1555
endocrine gland7.83e-1460
foregut8.25e-1480
gland1.64e-1265
unilaminar epithelium2.86e-1266
organ part9.18e-1299
endo-epithelium1.37e-1169
endocrine system5.73e-1172
mesoderm4.76e-10120
mesoderm-derived structure4.76e-10120
presumptive mesoderm4.76e-10120
subdivision of digestive tract1.54e-08114
digestive system2.52e-08116
digestive tract2.52e-08116
primitive gut2.52e-08116
endoderm-derived structure4.06e-08118
endoderm4.06e-08118
presumptive endoderm4.06e-08118
connective tissue3.47e-0746


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}