Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4659

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:07, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4659_endometrial_Renal_Wilms_testicular_gall_Smooth_leiomyoma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr7:140227291..140227300,-p@chr7:140227291..140227300
-
Hg19::chr7:140227303..140227330,-p@chr7:140227303..140227330
-
Hg19::chr7:140227349..140227360,-p@chr7:140227349..140227360
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
nephron tubule epithelium4.61e-2610
excretory tube3.63e-1916
kidney epithelium3.63e-1916
kidney8.43e-1926
kidney mesenchyme8.43e-1926
upper urinary tract8.43e-1926
kidney rudiment8.43e-1926
kidney field8.43e-1926
nephron epithelium1.01e-1615
renal tubule1.01e-1615
nephron tubule1.01e-1615
nephron1.01e-1615
uriniferous tubule1.01e-1615
nephrogenic mesenchyme1.01e-1615
cavitated compound organ3.08e-1531
cortex4.62e-1315
cortex of kidney6.82e-1312
renal parenchyma6.82e-1312
renal cortex tubule5.11e-113
region of nephron tubule5.11e-113
proximal tubule5.11e-113
urinary system structure1.93e-1047
abdomen element3.24e-1054
abdominal segment element3.24e-1054
renal system3.75e-1048
parenchyma4.46e-1015
abdominal segment of trunk7.86e-0960
abdomen7.86e-0960
reproductive organ3.23e-0848
gonad3.25e-0821
indifferent external genitalia3.25e-0821
indifferent gonad3.25e-0821
gonad primordium3.25e-0821
stroma4.37e-084
trunk region element8.30e-08101
external genitalia8.87e-0822
abdomen connective tissue1.20e-072
abdominal segment connective tissue1.20e-072
trunk connective tissue1.20e-072
interstitial tissue1.20e-072
extraglomerular mesangium1.20e-072
kidney interstitium1.20e-072
juxtaglomerular apparatus1.20e-072
mesangium1.20e-072
reproductive structure3.21e-0759
reproductive system3.21e-0759
male reproductive organ7.33e-0711


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.028121730833184



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.