Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1867

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:16, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1867_renal_bile_clear_Alveolar_mesothelioma_lung_prostate



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr20:33851543..33851550,+p@chr20:33851543..33851550
+
Hg19::chr20:33851569..33851604,+p@chr20:33851569..33851604
+
Hg19::chr20:33851612..33851622,+p@chr20:33851612..33851622
+
Hg19::chr20:33851644..33851656,+p@chr20:33851644..33851656
+
Hg19::chr20:33851666..33851675,+p@chr20:33851666..33851675
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
kidney8.42e-2227
kidney mesenchyme8.42e-2227
kidney rudiment8.42e-2227
kidney field8.42e-2227
duct2.11e-1826
cavitated compound organ4.28e-1732
mesonephros1.33e-1618
pronephros1.33e-1618
nephrogenic cord1.33e-1618
pronephric mesoderm1.33e-1618
rostral part of nephrogenic cord1.33e-1618
presumptive pronephric mesoderm1.33e-1618
urinary system structure1.74e-1644
renal system6.59e-1645
abdomen element9.53e-1655
abdominal segment element9.53e-1655
excretory tube1.12e-1517
mesonephric epithelium1.12e-1517
mesonephric tubule1.12e-1517
nephric duct1.12e-1517
kidney epithelium1.12e-1517
renal duct1.12e-1517
mesonephric duct1.12e-1517
pronephric duct1.12e-1517
nephron epithelium1.55e-1416
nephron1.55e-1416
uriniferous tubule1.55e-1416
metanephric mesenchyme1.55e-1416
nephrogenic mesenchyme1.55e-1416
urogenital ridge2.17e-1420
abdominal segment of trunk3.88e-1461
abdomen3.88e-1461
intraembryonic coelom1.90e-1321
larynx2.69e-129
intermediate mesoderm6.78e-1237
immaterial anatomical entity7.14e-12126
trunk region element9.93e-12107
body cavity precursor1.76e-1163
cortex of kidney3.33e-1113
renal parenchyma3.33e-1113
renal tubule2.02e-1012
nephron tubule2.02e-1012
nephron tubule epithelium2.02e-1012
cortex2.18e-1016
anatomical space2.85e-10104
subdivision of trunk9.98e-10113
organ1.23e-09511
multi-tissue structure1.24e-09347
anatomical cavity2.12e-0970
respiratory primordium2.42e-0938
endoderm of foregut2.42e-0938
primordium1.61e-08168
parenchyma8.35e-0817
organ part8.73e-08219
mesenchyme1.16e-07238
entire embryonic mesenchyme1.16e-07238
male organism1.65e-0722
male reproductive system1.65e-0722
male reproductive organ2.24e-0711
subdivision of digestive tract6.90e-07129
endodermal part of digestive tract6.90e-07129
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma3.11e-19106
cell type cancer1.75e-15143
cancer5.17e-09235
disease of cellular proliferation1.91e-08239


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.