Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1722: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|full_id=C1722_Nucleus_Anulus_parotid_Fibroblast_salivary_Olfactory_trachea
 

Latest revision as of 11:50, 17 September 2013


Full id: C1722_Nucleus_Anulus_parotid_Fibroblast_salivary_Olfactory_trachea



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr14:37126141..37126157,-p@chr14:37126141..37126157
-
Hg19::chr14:37126765..37126799,+p2@PAX9
Hg19::chr14:37126814..37126834,+p4@PAX9
Hg19::chr14:37126852..37126863,+p2@ENST00000555639
Hg19::chr14:37126870..37126882,+p1@ENST00000555639


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0007492endoderm development0.00980219003885553



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
mouth2.72e-5529
stomodeum2.72e-5529
oral opening4.48e-3622
anterior region of body1.42e-3162
craniocervical region1.42e-3162
subdivision of skeletal system1.85e-3116
subdivision of head1.00e-3049
orifice3.80e-2736
gland of gut1.31e-2610
head2.81e-2656
saliva-secreting gland9.35e-266
gland of oral region9.35e-266
gland of foregut9.35e-266
oral gland9.35e-266
oral cavity9.35e-266
axial skeletal system6.67e-2414
intervertebral cartilage1.21e-225
symphysis1.21e-225
nonsynovial joint1.21e-225
fibrous joint1.21e-225
cartilaginous joint1.21e-225
developing mesenchymal condensation1.21e-225
pre-cartilage condensation1.21e-225
cartilaginous condensation1.21e-225
cartilage element1.21e-225
post-cranial axial skeletal system1.21e-225
vertebral column1.21e-225
intervertebral disk1.21e-225
intervertebral joint1.21e-225
digestive system1.49e-19145
digestive tract1.49e-19145
primitive gut1.49e-19145
articulation1.50e-198
skeletal joint1.50e-198
articular system1.50e-198
respiratory system1.08e-1874
periodontium5.79e-186
dentition5.79e-186
endoderm-derived structure4.37e-17160
endoderm4.37e-17160
presumptive endoderm4.37e-17160
surface structure8.17e-1699
skull2.30e-157
nucleus pulposus5.86e-143
axial mesoderm5.86e-143
notochord5.86e-143
chordamesoderm5.86e-143
cranial skeletal system7.74e-1411
organ system subdivision3.63e-11223
chordate pharynx1.47e-1010
pharyngeal region of foregut1.47e-1010
annulus fibrosus1.93e-102
fibrocartilage1.93e-102
annulus fibrosus disci intervertebralis1.93e-102
foregut2.47e-1087
midface2.90e-102
major salivary gland4.54e-102
open tracheal system trachea6.20e-102
pharynx1.42e-0911
gingiva3.43e-098
organism subdivision1.33e-08264
subdivision of digestive tract1.66e-08118
multi-tissue structure2.16e-08342
anatomical cluster2.40e-08373
mouth mucosa3.13e-0813
mucosa2.54e-0720
cartilage tissue3.22e-073
skeletal tissue3.22e-073
esophagus9.28e-073
esophageal region9.28e-073


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.481059
MA0004.10.626788
MA0006.11.14863
MA0007.10.606704
MA0009.11.11255
MA0014.10.0418333
MA0017.10.496101
MA0019.10.784036
MA0024.11.00439
MA0025.11.24931
MA0027.12.73598
MA0028.10.470679
MA0029.11.02437
MA0030.11.01252
MA0031.10.945567
MA0038.10.736268
MA0040.11.03042
MA0041.10.64667
MA0042.10.612397
MA0043.11.11288
MA0046.11.10134
MA0048.11.08193
MA0050.10.613347
MA0051.11.73592
MA0052.11.03442
MA0055.10.288856
MA0056.10
MA0057.11.05691
MA0058.10.523638
MA0059.10.522232
MA0060.10.321781
MA0061.10.291022
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.736721
MA0067.11.43651
MA0068.14.57459
MA0069.11.09737
MA0070.11.08584
MA0071.10.695094
MA0072.11.0812
MA0073.10.362215
MA0074.10.730989
MA0076.10.540943
MA0077.11.07324
MA0078.10.836493
MA0081.10.522409
MA0083.11.12028
MA0084.11.62584
MA0087.12.44595
MA0088.10.132006
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.556637
MA0091.10.629594
MA0092.10.588959
MA0093.10.456342
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.750974
MA0101.10.459973
MA0103.10.442769
MA0105.10.175503
MA0106.10.779931
MA0107.10.378225
MA0108.20.94238
MA0109.10
MA0111.11.40074
MA0113.10.797251
MA0114.10.372523
MA0115.11.35895
MA0116.10.382106
MA0117.11.1512
MA0119.10.504689
MA0122.11.17777
MA0124.11.31673
MA0125.11.23103
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.855546
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.14377
MA0136.10.743749
MA0139.10.277033
MA0140.10.692258
MA0141.10.520334
MA0142.10.912455
MA0143.10.797437
MA0144.10.356507
MA0145.10.143698
MA0146.10.333008
MA0147.10.386018
MA0148.13.86742
MA0149.10.681935
MA0062.20.284987
MA0035.20.691506
MA0039.21.92202
MA0138.20.837782
MA0002.20.30855
MA0137.20.47779
MA0104.20.320919
MA0047.20.767096
MA0112.20.136971
MA0065.20.880827
MA0150.10.550239
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.69926
MA0153.11.21379
MA0154.10.172764
MA0155.10.409315
MA0156.10.480289
MA0157.10.883854
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.386729
MA0160.10.669748
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0592265
MA0163.11.49262
MA0164.10.810347
MA0080.20.456437
MA0018.20.781393
MA0099.20.699641
MA0079.21.53298
MA0102.21.66336
MA0258.10.345771
MA0259.10.395396
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066444.288205098460020.005152015588243280.0239313003033508
SUZ12#23512440.09262472885037.78750287036555e-073.41014260913253e-05



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.