Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1339

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:09, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1339_small_colon_signet_trachea_gall_adenocarcinoma_Renal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:2925001..2925048,-p4@SLC22A18AS
Hg19::chr3:168991226..168991244,-p@chr3:168991226..168991244
-
Hg19::chr6:31846768..31846780,-p1@SLC44A4
Hg19::chr9:130877529..130877536,-p@chr9:130877529..130877536
-
Hg19::chr9:130877564..130877577,-p@chr9:130877564..130877577
-
Hg19::chr9:130877614..130877619,-p@chr9:130877614..130877619
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell of stomach3.44e-073
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
gastrointestinal system5.14e-3825
intestine1.75e-3017
large intestine1.29e-2011
subdivision of digestive tract1.99e-20118
digestive system1.48e-18145
digestive tract1.48e-18145
primitive gut1.48e-18145
endoderm-derived structure1.21e-17160
endoderm1.21e-17160
presumptive endoderm1.21e-17160
lower digestive tract2.87e-155
colon2.13e-139
rectum5.71e-114
organ system subdivision1.27e-10223
gut epithelium1.30e-0954
small intestine1.67e-094
stomach2.11e-098
food storage organ2.11e-098
digestive tract diverticulum7.76e-0923
multi-tissue structure3.21e-08342
hindgut3.27e-0819
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction4.97e-0825
anatomical boundary4.97e-0825
hepatobiliary system4.97e-0825
foregut-midgut junction4.97e-0825
septum transversum4.97e-0825
adult organism9.54e-08114
sac1.04e-0726
gland5.37e-0759
anatomical cluster7.25e-07373
hepatic diverticulum8.04e-0722
liver primordium8.04e-0722
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
signet ring cell adenocarcinoma9.41e-112
gastrointestinal system cancer5.38e-0814


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
ATF3#467311.23158726300440.001593459971184230.0100391727049834
BHLHE40#8553322.43590677348870.0002103196104780280.00244632696277032
FOSL2#235538.465100302280850.003598315634615090.0182199401999208
FOXA1#316935.540709874692730.01192178777860280.0433757043654241
FOXA2#3170312.31523187633260.001219712440124520.0082046597664669
GATA1#262336.780154071900220.006765763983348560.0287461708090371
GATA2#262436.3724658667770.008058821308742550.0318832956536012
HDAC2#306636.707810118313130.006973940027962660.0294855203052543
HNF4A#3172311.56614518147680.001463487150085730.0093764268736767
HNF4G#3174314.37671126322340.0007769772937197380.00608981100028486
RXRA#6256310.03730856956660.002205419116789220.0127051556698301
SMARCA4#6597252.25530110262930.0005995659215741950.00500944522266299
TCF12#693835.317232451093210.013367345733860.0472412094307865
TCF7L2#693435.385088281568670.01290488779931040.0464013487871712
USF2#739236.49609869253480.007634319815300560.0314537349477366



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.