Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4659

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:17, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4659_endometrial_Renal_Wilms_testicular_gall_Smooth_leiomyoma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr7:140227291..140227300,-p@chr7:140227291..140227300
-
Hg19::chr7:140227303..140227330,-p@chr7:140227303..140227330
-
Hg19::chr7:140227349..140227360,-p@chr7:140227349..140227360
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
kidney2.33e-1927
kidney mesenchyme2.33e-1927
kidney rudiment2.33e-1927
kidney field2.33e-1927
intraembryonic coelom3.68e-1921
mesonephros2.79e-1818
pronephros2.79e-1818
nephrogenic cord2.79e-1818
pronephric mesoderm2.79e-1818
rostral part of nephrogenic cord2.79e-1818
presumptive pronephric mesoderm2.79e-1818
excretory tube5.60e-1717
mesonephric epithelium5.60e-1717
mesonephric tubule5.60e-1717
nephric duct5.60e-1717
kidney epithelium5.60e-1717
renal duct5.60e-1717
mesonephric duct5.60e-1717
pronephric duct5.60e-1717
body cavity precursor9.62e-1763
urogenital ridge6.01e-1620
renal tubule8.05e-1612
nephron tubule8.05e-1612
nephron tubule epithelium8.05e-1612
nephron epithelium1.04e-1516
nephron1.04e-1516
uriniferous tubule1.04e-1516
metanephric mesenchyme1.04e-1516
nephrogenic mesenchyme1.04e-1516
cavitated compound organ2.76e-1532
duct2.95e-1426
anatomical cavity4.75e-1470
anatomical space5.45e-14104
urinary system structure9.43e-1444
renal system2.79e-1345
gonad8.06e-1321
indifferent external genitalia8.06e-1321
indifferent gonad8.06e-1321
gonad primordium8.06e-1321
external genitalia4.90e-1222
intermediate mesoderm7.18e-1237
cortex of kidney1.29e-1113
renal parenchyma1.29e-1113
abdomen element3.27e-1155
abdominal segment element3.27e-1155
cortex7.11e-1116
immaterial anatomical entity3.83e-10126
reproductive structure8.67e-1059
reproductive system8.67e-1059
female gonad9.16e-1013
reproductive organ1.38e-0948
abdominal segment of trunk2.21e-0961
abdomen2.21e-0961
trunk region element3.05e-08107
parenchyma3.21e-0817
brain2.05e-0769
future brain2.05e-0769
telencephalon2.35e-0734
cerebral hemisphere3.74e-0732
regional part of forebrain5.61e-0741
forebrain5.61e-0741
future forebrain5.61e-0741
adult organism6.59e-07115
subdivision of trunk8.40e-07113
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
ovarian cancer1.46e-1114
reproductive organ cancer4.08e-0729
female reproductive organ cancer8.89e-0727


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.028121730833184



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.