Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4503

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 13:06, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4503_merkel_neuroblastoma_argyrophil_stomach_duodenum_small_eye



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr5:50679089..50679107,-p1@uc003joq.1
Hg19::chr5:50679228..50679288,+p1@ISL1
Hg19::chr5:50686515..50686516,+p@chr5:50686515..50686516
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0001755neural crest cell migration0.00718238549393618
GO:0014033neural crest cell differentiation0.00718238549393618
GO:0014032neural crest cell development0.00718238549393618
GO:0003007heart morphogenesis0.00718238549393618
GO:0048762mesenchymal cell differentiation0.00718238549393618
GO:0014031mesenchymal cell development0.00718238549393618
GO:0007507heart development0.0241122941582143



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure2.15e-18169
endoderm2.15e-18169
presumptive endoderm2.15e-18169
subdivision of digestive tract2.23e-18129
endodermal part of digestive tract2.23e-18129
digestive system9.63e-16155
digestive tract9.63e-16155
primitive gut9.63e-16155
gastrointestinal system7.23e-1335
intestine1.68e-1227
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure2.19e-12130
foregut2.96e-0898
hindgut9.22e-0819
reproductive structure1.71e-0759
reproductive system1.71e-0759
embryo3.84e-07612
male organism4.93e-0722
male reproductive system4.93e-0722
small intestine5.68e-0714
respiratory tract9.28e-0753
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cell type cancer2.54e-12143
carcinoma3.98e-09106
germ cell and embryonal cancer2.38e-0722
germ cell cancer2.38e-0722
cancer8.13e-07235


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
NANOG#79923219.49651898734180.003427255648501020.0174595947843421



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.