Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1009: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
|gostat_on_coexpression_clusters=GO:0009746!response to hexose stimulus!0.0225129102418388!9971$GO:0009749!response to glucose stimulus!0.0225129102418388!9971$GO:0008206!bile acid metabolic process!0.0225129102418388!9971$GO:0009743!response to carbohydrate stimulus!0.0225129102418388!9971$GO:0015020!glucuronosyltransferase activity!0.0325085945148712!133688$GO:0047485!protein N-terminus binding!0.0325085945148712!9971$GO:0010033!response to organic substance!0.0442824213577431!9971
|gostat_on_coexpression_clusters=GO:0009746!response to hexose stimulus!0.0225129102418388!9971$GO:0009749!response to glucose stimulus!0.0225129102418388!9971$GO:0008206!bile acid metabolic process!0.0225129102418388!9971$GO:0009743!response to carbohydrate stimulus!0.0225129102418388!9971$GO:0015020!glucuronosyltransferase activity!0.0325085945148712!133688$GO:0047485!protein N-terminus binding!0.0325085945148712!9971$GO:0010033!response to organic substance!0.0442824213577431!9971
|id=C1009
|id=C1009
|ontology_enrichment_celltype=CL:0002322!1.82e-10!5
|ontology_enrichment_disease=
|ontology_enrichment_uberon=UBERON:0005172!7.36e-11!55;UBERON:0005173!7.36e-11!55;UBERON:0002417!2.79e-09!61;UBERON:0000916!2.79e-09!61;UBERON:0003296!2.97e-09!4;UBERON:0010133!2.97e-09!4;UBERON:0004921!4.56e-09!129;UBERON:0004185!4.56e-09!129;UBERON:0002368!5.96e-09!35;UBERON:0009497!1.93e-08!25;UBERON:0000015!1.93e-08!25;UBERON:0002423!1.93e-08!25;UBERON:0006235!1.93e-08!25;UBERON:0004161!1.93e-08!25;UBERON:0001007!4.05e-08!155;UBERON:0001555!4.05e-08!155;UBERON:0007026!4.05e-08!155;UBERON:0007023!8.89e-08!115;UBERON:0009854!1.03e-07!23;UBERON:0005177!1.20e-07!107;UBERON:0000160!1.65e-07!27;UBERON:0000949!2.60e-07!45;UBERON:0004119!2.62e-07!169;UBERON:0000925!2.62e-07!169;UBERON:0006595!2.62e-07!169;UBERON:0003929!3.91e-07!54
}}
}}

Revision as of 14:05, 21 May 2012


Full id: C1009_kidney_liver_renal_Hepatocyte_small_temporal_pineal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:100897130..100897149,+p3@NR1H4
Hg19::chr5:35991404..35991414,-p4@UGT3A1
Hg19::chr5:35991417..35991426,-p5@UGT3A1
Hg19::chr5:35991427..35991444,-p3@UGT3A1
Hg19::chr5:35991458..35991478,-p1@UGT3A1
Hg19::chr5:35991486..35991509,-p2@UGT3A1
Hg19::chr5:35991543..35991554,-p6@UGT3A1
Hg19::chr7:47539812..47539818,-p@chr7:47539812..47539818
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0009746response to hexose stimulus0.0225129102418388
GO:0009749response to glucose stimulus0.0225129102418388
GO:0008206bile acid metabolic process0.0225129102418388
GO:0009743response to carbohydrate stimulus0.0225129102418388
GO:0015020glucuronosyltransferase activity0.0325085945148712
GO:0047485protein N-terminus binding0.0325085945148712
GO:0010033response to organic substance0.0442824213577431



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
embryonic stem cell1.82e-105
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
abdomen element7.36e-1155
abdominal segment element7.36e-1155
abdominal segment of trunk2.79e-0961
abdomen2.79e-0961
gland of diencephalon2.97e-094
neuroendocrine gland2.97e-094
subdivision of digestive tract4.56e-09129
endodermal part of digestive tract4.56e-09129
endocrine gland5.96e-0935
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction1.93e-0825
anatomical boundary1.93e-0825
hepatobiliary system1.93e-0825
foregut-midgut junction1.93e-0825
septum transversum1.93e-0825
digestive system4.05e-08155
digestive tract4.05e-08155
primitive gut4.05e-08155
adult organism8.89e-08115
digestive tract diverticulum1.03e-0723
trunk region element1.20e-07107
intestine1.65e-0727
endocrine system2.60e-0745
endoderm-derived structure2.62e-07169
endoderm2.62e-07169
presumptive endoderm2.62e-07169
gut epithelium3.91e-0754


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.