Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4728

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:55, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4728_immature_Gingival_malignant_epidermoid_esophagus_spleen_Mallassezderived



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr8:130798840..130798855,-p1@GSDMC
Hg19::chr8:130798864..130798876,-p2@GSDMC
Hg19::chr8:130798890..130798901,-p3@GSDMC


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure1.36e-15160
endoderm1.36e-15160
presumptive endoderm1.36e-15160
respiratory system1.99e-1474
digestive system2.05e-11145
digestive tract2.05e-11145
primitive gut2.05e-11145
orifice3.87e-1136
respiratory tract6.50e-1154
oral opening9.52e-1022
foregut1.49e-0987
urothelium1.79e-095
thoracic cavity element1.82e-0934
thoracic cavity1.82e-0934
subdivision of digestive tract4.06e-09118
thoracic segment organ4.50e-0935
surface structure9.98e-0999
endo-epithelium1.79e-0882
tracheobronchial tree2.94e-0815
lower respiratory tract2.94e-0815
embryonic structure3.28e-08564
mouth4.97e-0829
stomodeum4.97e-0829
transitional epithelium8.62e-086
segment of respiratory tract1.17e-0747
anatomical system1.49e-07624
anatomical group1.69e-07625
epithelial bud2.50e-0737
developing anatomical structure3.04e-07581
gingival epithelium3.52e-073
germ layer5.73e-07560
germ layer / neural crest5.73e-07560
embryonic tissue5.73e-07560
presumptive structure5.73e-07560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure5.73e-07560
epiblast (generic)5.73e-07560
blood vessel endothelium6.45e-0718
endothelium6.45e-0718
cardiovascular system endothelium6.45e-0718
trachea9.06e-077
respiratory airway9.06e-077
epithelial fold9.15e-0747
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
squamous cell carcinoma1.12e-1314


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
GATA2#2624312.7449317335540.0004829527704283790.0043909727858248
STAT3#6774310.51946499715420.0008589184530415310.00645774849306778



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.