Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1260

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:47, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1260_neuroectodermal_parietal_occipital_insula_amygdala_extraskeletal_frontal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr21:42218936..42218945,-p6@DSCAM
Hg19::chr21:42219044..42219059,-p4@DSCAM
Hg19::chr21:42219067..42219099,-p1@DSCAM
Hg19::chr21:42219120..42219129,-p10@DSCAM
Hg19::chr21:42219138..42219161,-p3@DSCAM
Hg19::chr21:42219168..42219187,-p2@DSCAM
Hg19::chr21:42219196..42219210,-p5@DSCAM


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
general ecto-epithelial cell1.20e-1114
ecto-epithelial cell4.36e-0834
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube8.10e-6156
neural rod8.10e-6156
future spinal cord8.10e-6156
neural keel8.10e-6156
regional part of nervous system4.61e-5653
regional part of brain4.61e-5653
central nervous system7.20e-5681
nervous system3.60e-5589
ecto-epithelium4.46e-54104
regional part of forebrain9.59e-5241
forebrain9.59e-5241
anterior neural tube9.59e-5241
future forebrain9.59e-5241
neurectoderm7.21e-4886
brain8.47e-4768
future brain8.47e-4768
neural plate1.94e-4682
presumptive neural plate1.94e-4682
telencephalon3.74e-4434
brain grey matter4.89e-4434
gray matter4.89e-4434
ectoderm-derived structure2.75e-43171
ectoderm2.75e-43171
presumptive ectoderm2.75e-43171
pre-chordal neural plate3.61e-4161
cerebral hemisphere7.31e-4132
regional part of telencephalon1.16e-4032
regional part of cerebral cortex9.78e-3822
neocortex1.42e-3420
cerebral cortex1.71e-3225
pallium1.71e-3225
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest8.50e-29132
adult organism3.21e-26114
organ system subdivision1.13e-23223
basal ganglion7.36e-139
nuclear complex of neuraxis7.36e-139
aggregate regional part of brain7.36e-139
collection of basal ganglia7.36e-139
cerebral subcortex7.36e-139
neural nucleus8.22e-139
nucleus of brain8.22e-139
organ part2.63e-12218
gyrus3.97e-126
brainstem2.76e-116
epithelium3.21e-11306
cell layer6.17e-11309
posterior neural tube1.04e-1015
chordal neural plate1.04e-1015
anatomical cluster1.80e-10373
occipital lobe1.85e-105
parietal lobe2.31e-105
temporal lobe3.79e-106
limbic system6.28e-105
telencephalic nucleus1.51e-097
tube3.51e-09192
diencephalon7.56e-097
future diencephalon7.56e-097
segmental subdivision of nervous system3.40e-0813
corpus striatum3.57e-084
striatum3.57e-084
ventral part of telencephalon3.57e-084
future corpus striatum3.57e-084
anatomical conduit1.02e-07240
organ2.03e-07503
embryonic structure6.44e-07564
segmental subdivision of hindbrain7.19e-0712
hindbrain7.19e-0712
presumptive hindbrain7.19e-0712
frontal cortex8.05e-073
pons9.36e-073


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
REST#597879.650028716128021.28195528172884e-077.32418641512461e-06
SUZ12#23512750.11578091106291.25242994278099e-121.74636222689057e-10
TBP#690873.706770687096390.0001039672097505110.00145182931128943
USF1#739176.361499277207962.37038582734158e-068.40613668664607e-05



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.