Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1089

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:40, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1089_Smooth_Small_Fibroblast_Prostate_anaplastic_mesenchymal_nasal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr6:83073334..83073351,+p8@TPBG
Hg19::chr6:83073396..83073408,+p5@TPBG
Hg19::chr6:83073511..83073522,+p6@TPBG
Hg19::chr6:83073525..83073551,+p1@TPBG
Hg19::chr6:83073553..83073601,+p2@TPBG
Hg19::chr6:83073952..83074004,+p3@TPBG
Hg19::chr6:83074008..83074024,+p9@TPBG
Hg19::chr6:83074273..83074294,+p@chr6:83074273..83074294
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
organism subdivision1.91e-18264
surface structure9.84e-1799
multilaminar epithelium1.80e-1683
trunk4.64e-15199
multi-cellular organism1.27e-13656
somite1.91e-1371
presomitic mesoderm1.91e-1371
presumptive segmental plate1.91e-1371
dermomyotome1.91e-1371
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.91e-1371
dense mesenchyme tissue2.77e-1373
paraxial mesoderm5.65e-1372
presumptive paraxial mesoderm5.65e-1372
epithelial vesicle4.27e-1278
skeletal muscle tissue9.19e-1162
striated muscle tissue9.19e-1162
myotome9.19e-1162
trunk mesenchyme9.44e-11122
muscle tissue1.08e-1064
musculature1.08e-1064
musculature of body1.08e-1064
multi-tissue structure1.85e-10342
organ component layer2.35e-1066
mesenchyme3.51e-10160
entire embryonic mesenchyme3.51e-10160
anatomical system1.15e-09624
anatomical group1.47e-09625
reproductive structure1.18e-0859
reproductive system1.18e-0859
systemic artery1.51e-0833
systemic arterial system1.51e-0833
integument1.78e-0846
integumental system1.78e-0846
artery1.81e-0842
arterial blood vessel1.81e-0842
arterial system1.81e-0842
unilaminar epithelium2.26e-08148
cell layer3.76e-08309
epithelium5.58e-08306
female organism8.66e-0841
skin of body1.09e-0741
endoderm-derived structure1.25e-07160
endoderm1.25e-07160
presumptive endoderm1.25e-07160
embryo4.26e-07592
orifice5.73e-0736
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm7.53e-0783
anatomical space9.58e-0795
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
ovarian cancer3.04e-0814


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066464.020192279806270.0008334820206774180.00629005193710014
E2F1#186963.680541911159490.001366491550819140.008992754321109
EP300#203354.23371357888950.002652037544592280.0146385576406994
FOXA1#316956.925887343365910.0002650891078941710.0028380975232557
POLR2A#543082.147453176558070.002210725788971910.0127258992820612
POU2F2#545255.691327536089080.000670954773528490.00541570798303903
RAD21#588556.47189618466020.0003657753484789720.00365002977448838
SMARCC2#6601558.8471090168117.33198250050869e-095.68904101315473e-07
SMC3#912659.403083028083036.12099279950925e-050.00100403701427351
TAF1#687272.925165500027130.001265325357915740.00849288657168136
TAF7#687957.145668378077450.0002284466637700410.00251993463429228
ZNF263#1012755.138651023131670.001082531249033560.00763960275138965



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.