Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3615

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:21, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr7:25155274..25155331,+p1@Kcnn4
Mm9::chr7:25155335..25155351,+p2@Kcnn4
Mm9::chr7:25163506..25163511,+p3@Kcnn4


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemolymphoid system1.44e-1748
immune system1.44e-1748
hematopoietic system1.01e-1645
blood island1.01e-1645
digestive system2.49e-11116
digestive tract2.49e-11116
primitive gut2.49e-11116
endoderm-derived structure2.71e-11118
endoderm2.71e-11118
presumptive endoderm2.71e-11118
connective tissue5.99e-1146
subdivision of digestive tract9.81e-11114
hemopoietic organ1.74e-0929
immune organ1.74e-0929
bone element2.56e-0922
skeletal element2.56e-0922
skeletal system2.56e-0922
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure4.98e-0935
bone marrow2.88e-0816
gland of gut2.70e-0724
foregut2.92e-0780
segment of respiratory tract4.52e-0727
gut epithelium4.63e-0755
pharynx6.67e-0724
upper respiratory tract6.67e-0724
chordate pharynx6.67e-0724
pharyngeal arch system6.67e-0724
pharyngeal region of foregut6.67e-0724


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}