Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3363

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:05, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3363_pineal_pituitary_cerebellum_medial_occipital_parietal_middle



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr13:29394461..29394487,+p@chr13:29394461..29394487
+
Hg19::chr6:166401568..166401573,-p4@LINC00473
Hg19::chr8:86133055..86133142,+p5@CA13


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0004089carbonate dehydratase activity0.0109011342674359
GO:0016836hydro-lyase activity0.0109011342674359
GO:0016835carbon-oxygen lyase activity0.0109011342674359
GO:0006730one-carbon compound metabolic process0.0125470976097963
GO:0016829lyase activity0.0180030613446368



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube9.97e-6956
neural rod9.97e-6956
future spinal cord9.97e-6956
neural keel9.97e-6956
adult organism2.38e-68114
regional part of nervous system8.73e-6453
regional part of brain8.73e-6453
regional part of forebrain6.92e-5341
forebrain6.92e-5341
anterior neural tube6.92e-5341
future forebrain6.92e-5341
neural plate1.34e-5082
presumptive neural plate1.34e-5082
central nervous system2.54e-5081
brain3.46e-5068
future brain3.46e-5068
neurectoderm1.69e-4786
nervous system9.59e-4689
telencephalon2.42e-4034
brain grey matter3.83e-4034
gray matter3.83e-4034
ecto-epithelium3.76e-38104
cerebral hemisphere6.50e-3832
regional part of telencephalon1.80e-3732
pre-chordal neural plate5.94e-3661
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest5.83e-35132
regional part of cerebral cortex2.54e-3122
cerebral cortex1.64e-2925
pallium1.64e-2925
neocortex8.70e-2820
ectoderm-derived structure2.21e-24171
ectoderm2.21e-24171
presumptive ectoderm2.21e-24171
organ system subdivision6.63e-23223
posterior neural tube2.58e-1615
chordal neural plate2.58e-1615
tube4.48e-16192
anatomical conduit5.14e-15240
diencephalon3.45e-147
future diencephalon3.45e-147
anatomical cluster3.91e-14373
basal ganglion1.21e-129
nuclear complex of neuraxis1.21e-129
aggregate regional part of brain1.21e-129
collection of basal ganglia1.21e-129
cerebral subcortex1.21e-129
gyrus1.99e-126
neural nucleus6.10e-129
nucleus of brain6.10e-129
segmental subdivision of hindbrain7.10e-1212
hindbrain7.10e-1212
presumptive hindbrain7.10e-1212
brainstem7.45e-116
segmental subdivision of nervous system8.48e-1113
limbic system2.01e-105
multi-tissue structure2.06e-10342
temporal lobe9.86e-106
gland of diencephalon1.82e-094
neuroendocrine gland1.82e-094
telencephalic nucleus2.33e-097
organ part4.66e-09218
regional part of diencephalon8.34e-094
organ1.07e-08503
epithelium5.62e-08306
cell layer9.34e-08309
regional part of metencephalon2.11e-079
metencephalon2.11e-079
future metencephalon2.11e-079
frontal cortex3.22e-073
occipital lobe4.09e-075
parietal lobe4.84e-075


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0278731933181129
SMC3#9126210.02995522995520.0126656379767470.0457189563700094



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.