Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3473

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:11, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3473_bronchioalveolar_papillotubular_gastric_gall_squamous_malignant_embryonic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr15:101390023..101390049,+p1@ENST00000431060
Hg19::chr15:101390060..101390073,+p2@ENST00000431060
Hg19::chr15:101397445..101397450,+p@chr15:101397445..101397450
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell4.84e-09254
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
organ part4.35e-12219
neural tube3.17e-1157
neural rod3.17e-1157
future spinal cord3.17e-1157
neural keel3.17e-1157
multi-tissue structure1.30e-10347
endoderm-derived structure1.42e-10169
endoderm1.42e-10169
presumptive endoderm1.42e-10169
neurectoderm1.74e-1090
neural plate2.90e-1086
presumptive neural plate2.90e-1086
regional part of forebrain4.74e-1041
forebrain4.74e-1041
future forebrain4.74e-1041
organ5.80e-10511
digestive system7.60e-10155
digestive tract7.60e-10155
primitive gut7.60e-10155
anterior neural tube1.58e-0942
regional part of brain7.07e-0959
intestine1.70e-0827
subdivision of digestive tract2.05e-08129
endodermal part of digestive tract2.05e-08129
gray matter2.53e-0834
brain grey matter2.53e-0834
telencephalon3.85e-0834
organ segment5.51e-0897
gastrointestinal system5.53e-0835
regional part of telencephalon6.25e-0833
pre-chordal neural plate1.31e-0761
cerebral hemisphere3.80e-0732
larynx9.88e-079
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma1.76e-20106
cell type cancer1.02e-18143
cancer1.17e-08235
squamous cell carcinoma1.37e-0814
disease of cellular proliferation1.81e-08239


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.