Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1089

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:51, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1089_Smooth_Small_Fibroblast_Prostate_anaplastic_mesenchymal_nasal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr6:83073334..83073351,+p8@TPBG
Hg19::chr6:83073396..83073408,+p5@TPBG
Hg19::chr6:83073511..83073522,+p6@TPBG
Hg19::chr6:83073525..83073551,+p1@TPBG
Hg19::chr6:83073553..83073601,+p2@TPBG
Hg19::chr6:83073952..83074004,+p3@TPBG
Hg19::chr6:83074008..83074024,+p9@TPBG
Hg19::chr6:83074273..83074294,+p@chr6:83074273..83074294
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
organism subdivision8.03e-18365
multilaminar epithelium2.58e-1782
trunk8.75e-17216
surface structure1.30e-1695
somite7.26e-1683
paraxial mesoderm7.26e-1683
presomitic mesoderm7.26e-1683
presumptive segmental plate7.26e-1683
trunk paraxial mesoderm7.26e-1683
presumptive paraxial mesoderm7.26e-1683
multi-cellular organism3.99e-15659
dermomyotome3.73e-1470
trunk mesenchyme6.24e-13143
mesenchyme4.48e-12238
entire embryonic mesenchyme4.48e-12238
multi-tissue structure8.49e-12347
skeletal muscle tissue1.71e-1161
striated muscle tissue1.71e-1161
myotome1.71e-1161
muscle tissue2.75e-1163
musculature2.75e-1163
musculature of body2.75e-1163
anatomical system1.78e-10625
anatomical group2.44e-10626
embryo8.69e-09612
systemic artery1.48e-0833
systemic arterial system1.48e-0833
integument1.78e-0845
integumental system1.78e-0845
artery1.89e-0842
arterial blood vessel1.89e-0842
arterial system1.89e-0842
cell layer2.16e-08312
epithelium3.01e-08309
reproductive structure3.37e-0859
reproductive system3.37e-0859
embryonic structure7.61e-08605
developing anatomical structure7.61e-08605
organ component layer7.86e-0857
germ layer9.28e-08604
embryonic tissue9.28e-08604
presumptive structure9.28e-08604
epiblast (generic)9.28e-08604
endoderm-derived structure1.03e-07169
endoderm1.03e-07169
presumptive endoderm1.03e-07169
skin of body1.35e-0740
female organism1.38e-0741
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.96e-0784
unilaminar epithelium6.73e-07138
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
ovarian cancer1.44e-0814


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.