Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1539

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:04, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:86348491..86348513,-p2@Stab2
Mm9::chr2:25483412..25483428,-p4@Fcna
Mm9::chr2:25483433..25483446,-p2@Fcna
Mm9::chr2:25483453..25483472,-p1@Fcna
Mm9::chr2:25483480..25483494,-p3@Fcna


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0030246carbohydrate binding0.00755975268068116
GO:0005540hyaluronic acid binding0.0315434894871784



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
exocrine gland4.31e-1425
exocrine system4.31e-1425
liver1.57e-1322
epithelial sac1.57e-1322
digestive gland1.57e-1322
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction1.57e-1322
anatomical boundary1.57e-1322
hepatobiliary system1.57e-1322
foregut-midgut junction1.57e-1322
hepatic diverticulum1.57e-1322
liver primordium1.57e-1322
septum transversum1.57e-1322
liver bud1.57e-1322
digestive tract diverticulum1.73e-1223
sac1.73e-1223
abdomen element1.53e-1149
abdominal segment element1.53e-1149
abdominal segment of trunk1.53e-1149
abdomen1.53e-1149
trunk region element3.02e-1079
trunk mesenchyme7.41e-1045
endocrine system3.19e-0972
immaterial anatomical entity8.81e-0979
trunk2.88e-0890
gland1.31e-0765
viscus1.82e-0719
subdivision of trunk2.41e-0766
epithelial tube4.82e-0747
mesenchyme5.04e-0761
entire embryonic mesenchyme5.04e-0761
foregut5.49e-0780


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}