Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:918

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:27, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:82834272..82834285,-p2@LOC100505399
p2@Slfn8
Mm9::chr11:82834290..82834345,-p1@LOC100505399
p1@Slfn8
Mm9::chr1:175872576..175872603,-p1@Gm16340
p1@Ifi203
p1@LOC100044071
p1@LOC100048583
Mm9::chr2:73324462..73324475,-p2@Wipf1
Mm9::chr4:149944223..149944234,-p@chr4:149944223..149944234
-
Mm9::chr5:121262634..121262677,+p1@Oas1b
Mm9::chr7:111594584..111594617,-p@chr7:111594584..111594617
-
Mm9::chr7:111613655..111613689,-p1@Trim30a


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0005522profilin binding0.0414121760644356



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemolymphoid system2.18e-1548
immune system2.18e-1548
hematopoietic system1.56e-1445
blood island1.56e-1445
lateral plate mesoderm1.71e-1187
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure5.17e-1035
mesoderm1.37e-09120
mesoderm-derived structure1.37e-09120
presumptive mesoderm1.37e-09120
hemopoietic organ5.41e-0929
immune organ5.41e-0929
foregut1.10e-0780
connective tissue5.68e-0746
musculoskeletal system6.38e-0732
gland of gut9.04e-0724


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}