Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1506

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:22, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1506_Endothelial_Lymphatic_Hepatic_Renal_breast_heart_thyroid



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:33661480..33661509,+p5@RASGRP3
Hg19::chr6:49534004..49534016,+p@chr6:49534004..49534016
+
Hg19::chr9:13432964..13432971,-p@chr9:13432964..13432971
-
Hg19::chr9:13432977..13433050,-p@chr9:13432977..13433050
-
Hg19::chrX:10544929..10544941,-p14@MID1
Hg19::chrX:45060170..45060188,-p4@CXorf36


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0046582Rap GTPase activator activity0.023047035862175



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism3.13e-39115
anatomical conduit8.13e-31241
anatomical cluster3.51e-27286
tube2.90e-23194
endothelium1.69e-1918
blood vessel endothelium1.69e-1918
cardiovascular system endothelium1.69e-1918
vessel2.00e-1869
epithelium1.60e-16309
cell layer5.46e-16312
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.06e-1584
simple squamous epithelium1.70e-1422
blood vessel3.35e-1460
epithelial tube open at both ends3.35e-1460
blood vasculature3.35e-1460
vascular cord3.35e-1460
vasculature5.52e-1479
vascular system5.52e-1479
neural tube1.90e-1357
neural rod1.90e-1357
future spinal cord1.90e-1357
neural keel1.90e-1357
anatomical system2.41e-13625
anatomical group3.18e-13626
circulatory system3.95e-13113
multi-cellular organism1.06e-12659
epithelial tube3.41e-12118
cardiovascular system6.20e-12110
squamous epithelium7.56e-1225
neural plate8.36e-1186
presumptive neural plate8.36e-1186
endothelial tube2.46e-109
arterial system endothelium2.46e-109
endothelium of artery2.46e-109
regional part of brain5.44e-1059
multi-tissue structure6.42e-10347
central nervous system9.87e-1082
neurectoderm1.07e-0990
anterior neural tube1.21e-0942
embryo1.38e-09612
embryonic structure4.89e-09605
developing anatomical structure4.89e-09605
regional part of forebrain5.67e-0941
forebrain5.67e-0941
future forebrain5.67e-0941
brain5.77e-0969
future brain5.77e-0969
anterior region of body6.74e-09129
craniocervical region6.74e-09129
regional part of nervous system8.28e-0994
nervous system8.28e-0994
germ layer1.11e-08604
embryonic tissue1.11e-08604
presumptive structure1.11e-08604
epiblast (generic)1.11e-08604
gray matter1.24e-0834
brain grey matter1.24e-0834
telencephalon1.34e-0834
lymphoid system1.88e-0810
neocortex2.74e-0820
regional part of cerebral cortex4.19e-0822
regional part of telencephalon4.20e-0833
head6.34e-08123
cerebral hemisphere9.94e-0832
ectoderm-derived structure1.05e-07169
compound organ1.45e-0769
vein2.90e-079
venous blood vessel2.90e-079
venous system2.90e-079
ectoderm4.00e-07173
presumptive ectoderm4.00e-07173
lymphatic vessel4.71e-078
lymph vasculature4.71e-078
lymphatic part of lymphoid system4.71e-078
brainstem5.90e-078
primary circulatory organ8.66e-0727


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.