Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2916: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0,0

Latest revision as of 12:15, 17 September 2013


Full id: C2916_pineal_neuroectodermal_cerebellum_small_neuroepithelioma_thyroid_neuroblastoma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr8:12809093..12809143,+p1@KIAA1456
Hg19::chr8:12809536..12809544,+p15@KIAA1456
Hg19::chr8:12809553..12809567,+p11@KIAA1456
Hg19::chr8:12809591..12809598,+p13@KIAA1456


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube4.75e-4856
neural rod4.75e-4856
future spinal cord4.75e-4856
neural keel4.75e-4856
central nervous system3.08e-4681
regional part of nervous system2.80e-4453
regional part of brain2.80e-4453
nervous system4.84e-4489
brain1.72e-4068
future brain1.72e-4068
neurectoderm2.19e-4086
regional part of forebrain3.63e-3541
forebrain3.63e-3541
anterior neural tube3.63e-3541
future forebrain3.63e-3541
neural plate6.83e-3582
presumptive neural plate6.83e-3582
telencephalon1.11e-3234
cerebral hemisphere1.16e-3232
adult organism1.34e-32114
brain grey matter2.89e-3234
gray matter2.89e-3234
regional part of telencephalon5.10e-3032
ectoderm-derived structure5.69e-30171
ectoderm5.69e-30171
presumptive ectoderm5.69e-30171
neocortex1.16e-2920
regional part of cerebral cortex1.85e-2922
ecto-epithelium9.17e-27104
cerebral cortex3.09e-2525
pallium3.09e-2525
pre-chordal neural plate1.61e-2361
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.03e-23132
organ system subdivision8.82e-19223
posterior neural tube1.26e-1315
chordal neural plate1.26e-1315
gyrus1.07e-106
segmental subdivision of hindbrain4.07e-1012
hindbrain4.07e-1012
presumptive hindbrain4.07e-1012
occipital lobe2.23e-095
segmental subdivision of nervous system3.55e-0913
brainstem4.46e-096
parietal lobe5.90e-095
temporal lobe8.88e-096
tube1.54e-08192
neural nucleus1.89e-089
nucleus of brain1.89e-089
anatomical cluster3.76e-08373
corpus striatum5.52e-084
striatum5.52e-084
ventral part of telencephalon5.52e-084
future corpus striatum5.52e-084
anatomical conduit3.58e-07240


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.17.59831
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.11.31813
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.13.76953
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.12.32784
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.25531
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.125954
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.248209
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.313194
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.11.8408
MA0072.14.279
MA0073.10.214613
MA0074.11.91637
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.11.4709
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.11.02755
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.11.33363
MA0103.11.29536
MA0105.10.232357
MA0106.12.01886
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.11.43218
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.12.47057
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.10.195821
MA0146.12.92476
MA0147.12.03364
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.21.13403
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.21.79838
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.24.85059
MA0065.20.199162
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.229241
MA0155.10.533581
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.12.15942
MA0163.11.37853
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.20.657636
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.14.94877
MA0259.11.1888
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186944.907389214879320.001724022357361790.0106825969137056
ZNF263#1012736.166381227758010.006539814347975980.027996871236607



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.