Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1678

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:49, 17 September 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1678_medulla_spinal_locus_pons_corpus_globus_thalamus



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:54765345..54765358,-p@chr12:54765345..54765358
-
Hg19::chr14:62010202..62010207,-p@chr14:62010202..62010207
-
Hg19::chr15:93616900..93616918,-p6@RGMA
Hg19::chr2:69741788..69741801,-p@chr2:69741788..69741801
-
Hg19::chr2:69741832..69741847,-p@chr2:69741832..69741847
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube2.76e-7956
neural rod2.76e-7956
future spinal cord2.76e-7956
neural keel2.76e-7956
regional part of nervous system9.15e-6853
regional part of brain9.15e-6853
central nervous system2.10e-5981
brain1.55e-5468
future brain1.55e-5468
nervous system6.92e-5389
adult organism2.08e-52114
neural plate2.89e-5282
presumptive neural plate2.89e-5282
neurectoderm1.53e-4986
brain grey matter7.67e-4934
gray matter7.67e-4934
regional part of forebrain8.16e-4941
forebrain8.16e-4941
anterior neural tube8.16e-4941
future forebrain8.16e-4941
telencephalon1.30e-4834
cerebral hemisphere1.94e-4132
regional part of telencephalon1.99e-4132
ecto-epithelium7.61e-40104
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.05e-36132
regional part of cerebral cortex1.44e-3622
neocortex1.31e-3420
cerebral cortex5.43e-3225
pallium5.43e-3225
posterior neural tube8.49e-3215
chordal neural plate8.49e-3215
pre-chordal neural plate2.09e-3161
brainstem5.08e-306
ectoderm-derived structure1.57e-24171
ectoderm1.57e-24171
presumptive ectoderm1.57e-24171
organ system subdivision1.15e-22223
tube2.14e-21192
segmental subdivision of hindbrain1.04e-1912
hindbrain1.04e-1912
presumptive hindbrain1.04e-1912
gyrus2.21e-196
neural nucleus1.33e-189
nucleus of brain1.33e-189
segmental subdivision of nervous system4.06e-1813
medulla oblongata5.36e-163
myelencephalon5.36e-163
future myelencephalon5.36e-163
spinal cord6.21e-163
dorsal region element6.21e-163
dorsum6.21e-163
pons8.34e-163
anatomical conduit1.13e-15240
anatomical cluster2.86e-13373
basal ganglion7.72e-139
nuclear complex of neuraxis7.72e-139
aggregate regional part of brain7.72e-139
collection of basal ganglia7.72e-139
cerebral subcortex7.72e-139
epithelium1.23e-11306
organ part1.26e-11218
cell layer1.89e-11309
locus ceruleus4.02e-112
brainstem nucleus4.02e-112
hindbrain nucleus4.02e-112
temporal lobe6.14e-116
telencephalic nucleus7.97e-117
middle temporal gyrus3.18e-102
limbic system4.77e-095
regional part of metencephalon4.78e-099
metencephalon4.78e-099
future metencephalon4.78e-099
occipital lobe5.04e-095
parietal lobe5.63e-095
multi-tissue structure1.22e-08342
frontal cortex3.18e-073
germ layer9.21e-07560
germ layer / neural crest9.21e-07560
embryonic tissue9.21e-07560
presumptive structure9.21e-07560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure9.21e-07560
epiblast (generic)9.21e-07560


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.280184
MA0004.10.626788
MA0006.10.452993
MA0007.10.606704
MA0009.11.11255
MA0014.10.161847
MA0017.10.496101
MA0019.10.784036
MA0024.11.00439
MA0025.11.24931
MA0027.12.73598
MA0028.10.470679
MA0029.11.02437
MA0030.11.01252
MA0031.10.945567
MA0038.10.736268
MA0040.11.03042
MA0041.10.64667
MA0042.10.612397
MA0043.11.11288
MA0046.11.10134
MA0048.11.08193
MA0050.10.613347
MA0051.10.731787
MA0052.11.03442
MA0055.17.41109
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.554727
MA0058.10.523638
MA0059.10.522232
MA0060.10.321781
MA0061.10.291022
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.736721
MA0067.11.43651
MA0068.10.692739
MA0069.11.09737
MA0070.11.08584
MA0071.10.695094
MA0072.11.0812
MA0073.10.00220137
MA0074.10.730989
MA0076.10.540943
MA0077.11.07324
MA0078.10.836493
MA0081.10.522409
MA0083.11.12028
MA0084.11.62584
MA0087.11.07867
MA0088.10.818263
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.556637
MA0091.12.58312
MA0092.10.588959
MA0093.10.456342
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.750974
MA0101.10.459973
MA0103.10.442769
MA0105.10.520776
MA0106.10.779931
MA0107.10.378225
MA0108.20.94238
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.5713
MA0113.10.797251
MA0114.10.372523
MA0115.11.35895
MA0116.10.382106
MA0117.11.1512
MA0119.11.25946
MA0122.11.17777
MA0124.11.31673
MA0125.11.23103
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.855546
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.14377
MA0136.10.743749
MA0139.10.277033
MA0140.10.692258
MA0141.10.520334
MA0142.10.912455
MA0143.11.87149
MA0144.10.356507
MA0145.10.143698
MA0146.10.143081
MA0147.10.386018
MA0148.10.653474
MA0149.10.681935
MA0062.20.284987
MA0035.20.691506
MA0039.20.0575907
MA0138.20.837782
MA0002.20.83106
MA0137.20.47779
MA0104.20.320919
MA0047.20.767096
MA0112.20.136971
MA0065.20.146576
MA0150.10.550239
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.69926
MA0153.11.21379
MA0154.10.98952
MA0155.11.3196
MA0156.10.480289
MA0157.10.883854
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.386729
MA0160.10.669748
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0592265
MA0163.10.382496
MA0164.10.810347
MA0080.20.456437
MA0018.20.781393
MA0099.20.699641
MA0079.20.00207114
MA0102.21.66336
MA0258.10.345771
MA0259.10.395396
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.