Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3930

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:42, 22 January 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3930_amygdala_insula_frontal_cerebral_occipital_medial_diencephalon



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:20812103..20812122,-p2@CAMK2N1
Hg19::chr1:20812134..20812149,-p3@CAMK2N1
Hg19::chr1:20812161..20812170,-p6@CAMK2N1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
fibroblast7.08e-0776
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
multi-tissue structure6.57e-39342
anatomical cluster1.76e-32373
multi-cellular organism3.50e-29656
organ system subdivision5.29e-29223
epithelium1.80e-28306
anatomical system1.85e-28624
anatomical group4.74e-28625
cell layer1.00e-27309
anatomical conduit3.84e-27240
organ part3.99e-26218
organ4.95e-24503
neural tube9.02e-2456
neural rod9.02e-2456
future spinal cord9.02e-2456
neural keel9.02e-2456
regional part of nervous system2.16e-2253
regional part of brain2.16e-2253
tube7.89e-21192
regional part of forebrain7.44e-2041
forebrain7.44e-2041
anterior neural tube7.44e-2041
future forebrain7.44e-2041
ectoderm-derived structure7.58e-20171
ectoderm7.58e-20171
presumptive ectoderm7.58e-20171
developing anatomical structure8.39e-20581
ecto-epithelium1.38e-19104
telencephalon1.95e-1934
central nervous system2.75e-1981
brain grey matter3.01e-1934
gray matter3.01e-1934
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest5.98e-19132
brain1.01e-1868
future brain1.01e-1868
embryo1.29e-18592
cerebral hemisphere2.19e-1832
regional part of telencephalon3.36e-1832
neural plate2.36e-1782
presumptive neural plate2.36e-1782
embryonic structure1.43e-16564
nervous system4.03e-1689
germ layer5.49e-16560
germ layer / neural crest5.49e-16560
embryonic tissue5.49e-16560
presumptive structure5.49e-16560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure5.49e-16560
epiblast (generic)5.49e-16560
neurectoderm1.87e-1586
organism subdivision4.89e-15264
regional part of cerebral cortex5.70e-1522
cerebral cortex3.32e-1425
pallium3.32e-1425
endoderm-derived structure5.50e-14160
endoderm5.50e-14160
presumptive endoderm5.50e-14160
neocortex9.58e-1420
adult organism1.41e-13114
pre-chordal neural plate1.89e-1361
mesenchyme3.37e-12160
entire embryonic mesenchyme3.37e-12160
digestive system3.81e-12145
digestive tract3.81e-12145
primitive gut3.81e-12145
trunk8.82e-12199
surface structure1.90e-1199
organ component layer1.85e-0966
subdivision of digestive tract1.01e-08118
trunk mesenchyme2.31e-08122
subdivision of trunk4.17e-07112
renal system4.22e-0748
urinary system structure6.40e-0747
basal ganglion7.24e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis7.24e-079
aggregate regional part of brain7.24e-079
collection of basal ganglia7.24e-079
cerebral subcortex7.24e-079


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.15.30359
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.14.7105
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.11.62115
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.190716
MA0056.10
MA0057.12.4146
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.407479
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.12.03569
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.752137
MA0146.10.707589
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.22.15877
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.10.256269
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.8915
MA0163.14.77883
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.28.812
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.0109493210106162



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.