Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3217

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 22:35, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr19:8692623..8692643,+p3@Slc22a6
Mm9::chr19:8692650..8692674,+p2@Slc22a6
Mm9::chr19:8692679..8692690,+p4@Slc22a6


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
CNS neuron (sensu Vertebrata)3.50e-1023
neuroblast (sensu Vertebrata)3.50e-1023

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
regional part of nervous system8.96e-2254
neural tube5.51e-1952
neural rod5.51e-1952
future spinal cord5.51e-1952
neural keel5.51e-1952
central nervous system3.84e-1873
brain4.47e-1847
future brain4.47e-1847
regional part of brain3.05e-1746
nervous system3.13e-1775
neurectoderm6.34e-1764
neural plate6.34e-1764
presumptive neural plate6.34e-1764
anterior neural tube7.78e-1640
pre-chordal neural plate3.84e-1549
regional part of forebrain4.41e-1539
forebrain4.41e-1539
future forebrain4.41e-1539
ectoderm-derived structure4.26e-1495
ectoderm4.26e-1495
presumptive ectoderm4.26e-1495
ecto-epithelium4.26e-1373
gray matter9.60e-1234
brain grey matter1.35e-0929
regional part of telencephalon1.35e-0929
telencephalon1.35e-0929
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.10e-0892
cavitated compound organ5.06e-0821
kidney2.84e-0714
kidney mesenchyme2.84e-0714
upper urinary tract2.84e-0714
kidney rudiment2.84e-0714
kidney field2.84e-0714
diencephalon6.43e-0710
future diencephalon6.43e-0710


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}