Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1736

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:21, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr1:106665087..106665103,+p1@Cdh20
Mm9::chr1:106665173..106665185,+p3@Cdh20
Mm9::chr1:106665373..106665400,+p2@Cdh20
Mm9::chr6:25639547..25639561,-p8@Gpr37
Mm9::chr6:25639592..25639608,-p9@Gpr37


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
ectoderm-derived structure2.17e-2995
ectoderm2.17e-2995
presumptive ectoderm2.17e-2995
neurectoderm2.57e-2764
neural plate2.57e-2764
presumptive neural plate2.57e-2764
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.65e-2792
central nervous system4.24e-2673
nervous system5.42e-2675
ecto-epithelium1.00e-2473
regional part of nervous system5.96e-2054
neural tube3.43e-1852
neural rod3.43e-1852
future spinal cord3.43e-1852
neural keel3.43e-1852
pre-chordal neural plate3.81e-1749
brain1.76e-1447
future brain1.76e-1447
regional part of brain8.38e-1446
gray matter1.59e-1334
anterior neural tube9.71e-1140
brain grey matter4.22e-1029
regional part of telencephalon4.22e-1029
telencephalon4.22e-1029
regional part of forebrain5.69e-1039
forebrain5.69e-1039
future forebrain5.69e-1039
posterior neural tube3.83e-0912
chordal neural plate3.83e-0912
occipital lobe4.84e-0910
visual cortex4.84e-0910
neocortex4.84e-0910
eye1.53e-089
camera-type eye1.53e-089
simple eye1.53e-089
immature eye1.53e-089
ocular region1.53e-089
visual system1.53e-089
face1.53e-089
optic cup1.53e-089
optic vesicle1.53e-089
eye primordium1.53e-089
sense organ2.56e-0812
sensory system2.56e-0812
entire sense organ system2.56e-0812
tube7.82e-08114
head2.09e-0713
ectodermal placode2.09e-0713
anatomical conduit2.42e-07122
regional part of cerebral cortex5.54e-0717


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}