Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1295

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:41, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:60166371..60166398,-p1@Tom1l2
Mm9::chr13:6647963..6648018,-p1@Pfkp
Mm9::chr15:36723231..36723251,-p8@Ywhaz
Mm9::chr1:34906795..34906855,+p1@Plekhb2
Mm9::chr4:154273186..154273206,-p2@2810405K02Rik
Mm9::chr4:155043280..155043340,-p1@Mib2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
regional part of nervous system6.27e-1354
central nervous system5.37e-1273
nervous system6.15e-1275
neural tube7.92e-1252
neural rod7.92e-1252
future spinal cord7.92e-1252
neural keel7.92e-1252
adult organism3.93e-1151
ectoderm-derived structure1.17e-1095
ectoderm1.17e-1095
presumptive ectoderm1.17e-1095
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.64e-1092
brain4.25e-1047
future brain4.25e-1047
gray matter9.34e-1034
regional part of brain1.13e-0946
intestine3.96e-0931
neurectoderm1.03e-0864
neural plate1.03e-0864
presumptive neural plate1.03e-0864
brain grey matter3.53e-0829
regional part of telencephalon3.53e-0829
telencephalon3.53e-0829
ecto-epithelium6.11e-0873
anterior neural tube1.44e-0740
mucosa2.00e-0715
regional part of forebrain3.99e-0739
forebrain3.99e-0739
future forebrain3.99e-0739
occipital lobe4.74e-0710
visual cortex4.74e-0710
neocortex4.74e-0710


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}