Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3684

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:17, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3684_salivary_parotid_seminal_submaxillary_Dendritic_medulla_Alveolar



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:7462031..7462086,+p2@TNFSF13
Hg19::chr17:7462091..7462102,+p9@TNFSF13
Hg19::chr17:7462103..7462110,+p14@TNFSF13


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor9.55e-0861
monopoietic cell7.99e-0759
monocyte7.99e-0759
monoblast7.99e-0759
promonocyte7.99e-0759
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell9.76e-0767
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.69e-51114
neural tube1.12e-2656
neural rod1.12e-2656
future spinal cord1.12e-2656
neural keel1.12e-2656
regional part of nervous system1.28e-2453
regional part of brain1.28e-2453
regional part of forebrain9.71e-2041
forebrain9.71e-2041
anterior neural tube9.71e-2041
future forebrain9.71e-2041
brain grey matter2.10e-1834
gray matter2.10e-1834
brain2.18e-1868
future brain2.18e-1868
telencephalon5.47e-1834
central nervous system1.67e-1781
cerebral hemisphere7.32e-1732
neural plate1.07e-1682
presumptive neural plate1.07e-1682
regional part of telencephalon1.14e-1632
neurectoderm6.45e-1686
organ system subdivision2.98e-14223
nervous system4.11e-1489
regional part of cerebral cortex5.22e-1422
organ1.83e-13503
neocortex1.33e-1220
pre-chordal neural plate4.83e-1261
ecto-epithelium1.37e-11104
cerebral cortex1.46e-1125
pallium1.46e-1125
tube2.23e-11192
anatomical conduit1.46e-10240
developing anatomical structure6.72e-10581
anatomical cluster7.74e-10373
embryo1.16e-09592
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.90e-09132
neural nucleus7.80e-099
nucleus of brain7.80e-099
basal ganglion1.02e-089
nuclear complex of neuraxis1.02e-089
aggregate regional part of brain1.02e-089
collection of basal ganglia1.02e-089
cerebral subcortex1.02e-089
embryonic structure1.04e-08564
anatomical system2.20e-08624
germ layer2.44e-08560
germ layer / neural crest2.44e-08560
embryonic tissue2.44e-08560
presumptive structure2.44e-08560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure2.44e-08560
epiblast (generic)2.44e-08560
anatomical group2.72e-08625
posterior neural tube4.20e-0815
chordal neural plate4.20e-0815
multi-cellular organism7.96e-08656
multi-tissue structure2.01e-07342
telencephalic nucleus5.46e-077
brainstem5.73e-076


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CEBPB#105137.971147625824820.001974187055288560.0115172674487365
STAT1#6772320.70658749719920.0001125992441046670.00154794688101189
STAT3#6774310.51946499715420.0008589184530415310.00642444920985494
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00615282851335825



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.