Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3669

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:16, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3669_B_Dendritic_splenic_adult_xeroderma_hereditary_b



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:67114473..67114480,-p5@ABCA6
Hg19::chr19:7764314..7764346,-p2@FCER2
Hg19::chr1:183559882..183559940,-p9@NCF2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0019863IgE binding0.0260477980848495
GO:0019865immunoglobulin binding0.0312398778455792
GO:0006801superoxide metabolic process0.0312398778455792
GO:0001669acrosome0.0312398778455792
GO:0005178integrin binding0.0390257069868824
GO:0006800oxygen and reactive oxygen species metabolic process0.0390257069868824



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
nongranular leukocyte4.48e-63115
leukocyte1.84e-60136
defensive cell1.86e-5848
phagocyte1.86e-5848
classical monocyte4.45e-5842
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte4.45e-5842
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.77e-5661
monopoietic cell6.11e-5659
monocyte6.11e-5659
monoblast6.11e-5659
promonocyte6.11e-5659
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.55e-55120
hematopoietic stem cell6.76e-52168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell6.76e-52168
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.50e-51161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.50e-51161
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.83e-5067
hematopoietic cell8.81e-50177
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.11e-4866
myeloid leukocyte3.43e-4872
myeloid cell2.45e-39108
common myeloid progenitor2.45e-39108
stuff accumulating cell8.08e-2787
mesenchymal cell2.01e-14354
connective tissue cell8.78e-14361
lymphocyte of B lineage5.50e-1324
pro-B cell5.50e-1324
motile cell1.53e-11386
lymphocyte5.71e-1153
common lymphoid progenitor5.71e-1153
nucleate cell2.24e-1055
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell5.63e-1052
multi fate stem cell2.12e-09427
somatic stem cell5.07e-09433
conventional dendritic cell1.05e-088
stem cell1.55e-08441
dendritic cell5.95e-0710
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
lymphoma1.29e-1210


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.