Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3487

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:10, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3487_mucinous_brain_temporal_cerebral_stomach_postcentral_occipital



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr15:41786021..41786055,+p2@ITPKA
Hg19::chr15:41786065..41786081,+p1@ITPKA
Hg19::chr15:41786087..41786090,+p8@ITPKA


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
telencephalon5.14e-2034
cerebral hemisphere1.82e-1932
regional part of telencephalon1.03e-1832
regional part of forebrain2.99e-1741
forebrain2.99e-1741
anterior neural tube2.99e-1741
future forebrain2.99e-1741
brain grey matter5.90e-1734
gray matter5.90e-1734
brain1.40e-1668
future brain1.40e-1668
regional part of cerebral cortex9.66e-1622
regional part of nervous system7.99e-1553
regional part of brain7.99e-1553
neocortex2.20e-1420
cerebral cortex6.17e-1425
pallium6.17e-1425
neural tube2.58e-1356
neural rod2.58e-1356
future spinal cord2.58e-1356
neural keel2.58e-1356
nervous system3.07e-1389
central nervous system7.10e-1381
pre-chordal neural plate1.55e-1161
organ system subdivision5.77e-11223
neurectoderm2.85e-0886
basal ganglion2.98e-089
nuclear complex of neuraxis2.98e-089
aggregate regional part of brain2.98e-089
collection of basal ganglia2.98e-089
cerebral subcortex2.98e-089
gastrointestinal system3.24e-0825
neural plate4.56e-0882
presumptive neural plate4.56e-0882
multi-tissue structure1.02e-07342
gyrus3.30e-076
anatomical cluster9.83e-07373
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
disease of cellular proliferation2.88e-19239
cancer5.47e-19235
cell type cancer1.02e-13143
carcinoma5.02e-11106
organ system cancer5.89e-10137
disease of anatomical entity1.04e-0739
adenocarcinoma2.78e-0725


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.018964457106539
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0324504002306318
E2F4#1874312.66806031528440.0004917987006298980.00436388823237774
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.032138222643374
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0319855380742108
NFKB1#479035.488063424193840.006049381815655430.0269168109852266
SMARCC1#6599343.66335931963151.20046018043203e-050.00030130944672949
SP1#666735.69838137814090.005403962701712170.0246004908292266
TFAP2A#7020316.5186343730450.0002218033880766340.00247753198367226
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00614231554583672
ZBTB7A#5134137.35190930787590.002516255860282270.0139866542015019



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.