Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1496

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:56, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1496_Fibroblast_Smooth_papillotubular_basal_liposarcoma_tenocyte_mesenchymal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:158114174..158114187,+p6@GALNT5
Hg19::chr2:158114199..158114286,+p1@GALNT5
Hg19::chr2:158114415..158114429,+p7@GALNT5
Hg19::chr2:158114442..158114458,+p5@GALNT5
Hg19::chr2:158114478..158114500,+p3@GALNT5
Hg19::chr2:158114516..158114531,+p4@GALNT5


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
surface structure5.89e-1799
multilaminar epithelium1.73e-1483
skeletal muscle tissue9.76e-1362
striated muscle tissue9.76e-1362
myotome9.76e-1362
somite1.50e-1271
presomitic mesoderm1.50e-1271
presumptive segmental plate1.50e-1271
dermomyotome1.50e-1271
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.50e-1271
dense mesenchyme tissue1.52e-1273
muscle tissue2.12e-1264
musculature2.12e-1264
musculature of body2.12e-1264
paraxial mesoderm4.02e-1272
presumptive paraxial mesoderm4.02e-1272
epithelial vesicle7.80e-1078
organism subdivision1.90e-09264
skin of body3.11e-0941
integument3.59e-0946
integumental system3.59e-0946
subdivision of skeletal system2.79e-0816
systemic artery2.92e-0833
systemic arterial system2.92e-0833
mouth4.02e-0829
stomodeum4.02e-0829
artery6.43e-0842
arterial blood vessel6.43e-0842
arterial system6.43e-0842
multi-tissue structure8.87e-08342
head2.43e-0756
subdivision of head5.07e-0749
axial skeletal system6.69e-0714


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
GATA1#262349.04020542920030.0003927397840144870.00384129521471146
GTF2B#2959526.61985827860351.75395614148e-079.6107778310614e-06
HEY1#2346264.040111043105710.0002298968555807510.00253325571850581
POLR2A#543062.147453176558070.01019570676818780.0380527255534706
TAL1#6886629.86861667744021.40504918791418e-091.25958740031389e-07
TBP#690863.706770687096390.000385416472907960.00377993342229641
TRIM28#10155618.59052504526252.41896703530258e-081.69439636619696e-06
YY1#752864.911170749853867.12445972864136e-050.00112397499939513



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.