Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4112

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:41, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4112_carcinosarcoma_merkel_small_signet_retinoblastoma_carcinoid_mesenchymal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:10263300..10263329,+p5@RRM2
Hg19::chr2:10263330..10263355,+p3@RRM2
Hg19::chr2:10263360..10263373,+p6@RRM2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
neural cell4.43e-0925
neuron associated cell6.02e-0817
neuron associated cell (sensu Vertebrata)6.02e-0817
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
larynx6.86e-109
upper respiratory tract6.54e-0919
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cancer1.64e-23235
disease of cellular proliferation3.74e-23239
cell type cancer2.92e-17143
carcinoma1.61e-14106
organ system cancer7.13e-09137
lymphoma9.51e-0710


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BCLAF1#9774214.43509840674790.006201147435546130.0273890567969636
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.0190401003193381
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0326036545282933
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0322989012035784
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0463307613956803
HMGN3#932438.178547723350590.001827766942164210.0108887200771598
NFKB1#479035.488063424193840.006049381815655430.0270042480528824
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0277358186946061
ZBTB7A#5134137.35190930787590.002516255860282270.0140509675341934
ZEB1#6935316.88843201754390.0002075486917327580.00243088233888948
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.010961457822891



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.