Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2994

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:40, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2994_osteosarcoma_Fibroblast_mesodermal_Wilms_fibrous_Lymphatic_neuroectodermal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:14050416..14050460,-p5@FRMD4A
Hg19::chr10:14050463..14050515,-p4@FRMD4A
Hg19::chr10:14050522..14050584,-p3@FRMD4A


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
vessel3.65e-2268
vasculature1.23e-2178
vascular system1.23e-2178
epithelial tube open at both ends5.75e-2059
blood vessel5.75e-2059
blood vasculature5.75e-2059
vascular cord5.75e-2059
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm4.66e-1883
anatomical cluster1.19e-17373
artery1.28e-1642
arterial blood vessel1.28e-1642
arterial system1.28e-1642
circulatory system7.84e-16112
cardiovascular system1.08e-15109
anatomical conduit1.21e-15240
systemic artery1.09e-1433
systemic arterial system1.09e-1433
tube2.68e-14192
cell layer1.35e-13309
epithelium5.80e-13306
epithelial vesicle3.31e-1278
epithelial tube1.77e-11117
dense mesenchyme tissue3.99e-1173
muscle tissue4.57e-1164
musculature4.57e-1164
musculature of body4.57e-1164
skeletal muscle tissue4.71e-1162
striated muscle tissue4.71e-1162
myotome4.71e-1162
aorta6.36e-1121
aortic system6.36e-1121
paraxial mesoderm7.70e-1172
presumptive paraxial mesoderm7.70e-1172
somite9.14e-1171
presomitic mesoderm9.14e-1171
presumptive segmental plate9.14e-1171
dermomyotome9.14e-1171
trunk paraxial mesoderm9.14e-1171
multi-cellular organism1.56e-10656
unilaminar epithelium4.78e-10148
anatomical system6.41e-10624
anatomical group1.01e-09625
multi-tissue structure2.10e-09342
multilaminar epithelium6.16e-0983
trunk mesenchyme7.94e-09122
mesenchyme4.05e-08160
entire embryonic mesenchyme4.05e-08160
blood vessel endothelium8.13e-0818
endothelium8.13e-0818
cardiovascular system endothelium8.13e-0818
squamous epithelium2.32e-0725
adult organism3.69e-07114
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest7.01e-07132


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.0166749941706542
GATA2#2624312.7449317335540.0004829527704283790.00435796651034815
MAX#414936.452555509007120.003721913834265510.0185631785547686
TCF12#6938310.63446490218640.0008313523990202070.00627488712880475
USF1#739136.361499277207960.00388404057290560.0189412268114348
USF2#7392312.99219738506960.0004558979393427810.0042028003254498



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.