Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:645

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:01, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:100750866..100750891,-p@chr11:100750866..100750891
-
Mm9::chr12:60289431..60289446,+p@chr12:60289431..60289446
+
Mm9::chr13:34274534..34274552,-p@chr13:34274534..34274552
-
Mm9::chr15:12251371..12251380,+p5@Golph3
Mm9::chr15:96518755..96518774,-p@chr15:96518755..96518774
-
Mm9::chr19:46589812..46589830,+p@chr19:46589812..46589830
+
Mm9::chr2:133378740..133378753,+p2@Bmp2
Mm9::chr4:59489147..59489161,-p@chr4:59489147..59489161
-
Mm9::chr5:65213356..65213412,+p6@Klf3
Mm9::chr5:65213459..65213485,+p12@Klf3
Mm9::chr5:65214223..65214249,+p@chr5:65214223..65214249
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0048711positive regulation of astrocyte differentiation0.0274145700786072
GO:0048710regulation of astrocyte differentiation0.0274145700786072
GO:0014015positive regulation of gliogenesis0.0274145700786072
GO:0045687positive regulation of glial cell differentiation0.0274145700786072
GO:0045778positive regulation of ossification0.0274145700786072
GO:0046852positive regulation of bone remodeling0.0274145700786072
GO:0045669positive regulation of osteoblast differentiation0.0274145700786072
GO:0048708astrocyte differentiation0.0274145700786072
GO:0001837epithelial to mesenchymal transition0.0274145700786072
GO:0014013regulation of gliogenesis0.0274145700786072
GO:0045685regulation of glial cell differentiation0.0274145700786072
GO:0045667regulation of osteoblast differentiation0.0334984357436158
GO:0035051cardiac cell differentiation0.0386425113870819
GO:0001658ureteric bud branching0.0430481817489659
GO:0030282bone mineralization0.0495686167483751
GO:0030278regulation of ossification0.0495686167483751
GO:0001649osteoblast differentiation0.0495686167483751
GO:0030509BMP signaling pathway0.0495686167483751
GO:0046850regulation of bone remodeling0.0495686167483751
GO:0001657ureteric bud development0.0495686167483751
GO:0015171amino acid transmembrane transporter activity0.0495686167483751
GO:0042475odontogenesis of dentine-containing teeth0.0495686167483751
GO:0042476odontogenesis0.0495686167483751
GO:0010001glial cell differentiation0.0495686167483751
GO:0048762mesenchymal cell differentiation0.0495686167483751
GO:0014031mesenchymal cell development0.0495686167483751
GO:0042063gliogenesis0.0495686167483751
GO:0006865amino acid transport0.0495686167483751
GO:0001656metanephros development0.0495686167483751
GO:0045597positive regulation of cell differentiation0.0495686167483751
GO:0007179transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathway0.0495686167483751



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure1.29e-10118
endoderm1.29e-10118
presumptive endoderm1.29e-10118
organism subdivision6.60e-10150
digestive system6.94e-10116
digestive tract6.94e-10116
primitive gut6.94e-10116
subdivision of digestive tract1.02e-09114
subdivision of trunk3.42e-0866
trunk region element5.32e-0879
abdomen element6.05e-0849
abdominal segment element6.05e-0849
abdominal segment of trunk6.05e-0849
abdomen6.05e-0849
foregut7.38e-0880
trunk8.32e-0890
primordium4.25e-07134
multi-cellular organism4.43e-07333


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}