Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:549

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:52, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:3291643..3291648,+p@chr10:3291643..3291648
+
Mm9::chr10:75036195..75036209,+p15@Ggt1
Mm9::chr12:31949130..31949155,+p@chr12:31949130..31949155
+
Mm9::chr12:70892312..70892325,-p@chr12:70892312..70892325
-
Mm9::chr16:26463232..26463247,+p3@Cldn16
Mm9::chr16:55523894..55523897,-p@chr16:55523894..55523897
-
Mm9::chr17:43640962..43640970,-p@chr17:43640962..43640970
-
Mm9::chr1:129203283..129203329,+p6@Mgat5
Mm9::chr1:13650826..13650836,-p3@Lactb2
Mm9::chr2:62249752..62249763,-p@chr2:62249752..62249763
-
Mm9::chr2:74543143..74543158,+p9@Hoxd8
Mm9::chr7:31244710..31244719,+p4@Nphs1
Mm9::chr7:31244771..31244782,+p2@Nphs1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0030144alpha-1,6-mannosyl-glycoprotein 6-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase activity0.0374681592963941
GO:0004662CAAX-protein geranylgeranyltransferase activity0.0374681592963941



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
kidney2.73e-3514
kidney mesenchyme2.73e-3514
upper urinary tract2.73e-3514
kidney rudiment2.73e-3514
kidney field2.73e-3514
urinary system structure3.69e-2718
renal system1.16e-2519
cavitated compound organ4.34e-2321
compound organ1.49e-1043
abdomen element4.42e-0949
abdominal segment element4.42e-0949
abdominal segment of trunk4.42e-0949
abdomen4.42e-0949
mesenchyme5.29e-0761
entire embryonic mesenchyme5.29e-0761


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}