Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2357

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:04, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2357_extraskeletal_small_Pericytes_alveolar_epithelioid_Fibroblast_Mesenchymal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr15:96874063..96874074,+p10@NR2F2
Hg19::chr15:96874145..96874166,+p7@NR2F2
Hg19::chr15:96874216..96874236,+p13@NR2F2
Hg19::chr15:96874244..96874259,+p5@NR2F2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
trunk1.40e-25216
epithelial tube7.46e-18118
organism subdivision3.27e-17365
vasculature6.59e-1779
vascular system6.59e-1779
unilaminar epithelium9.23e-17138
mesenchyme1.06e-16238
entire embryonic mesenchyme1.06e-16238
multi-tissue structure1.65e-16347
trunk mesenchyme3.25e-16143
cell layer4.82e-16312
subdivision of trunk3.50e-15113
epithelium4.52e-15309
vessel7.14e-1469
anatomical conduit2.09e-13241
anatomical cluster2.30e-13286
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm7.21e-1384
immaterial anatomical entity6.26e-12126
blood vessel2.18e-1160
epithelial tube open at both ends2.18e-1160
blood vasculature2.18e-1160
vascular cord2.18e-1160
multi-cellular organism2.21e-11659
abdominal segment of trunk4.19e-1161
abdomen4.19e-1161
body cavity precursor1.44e-1063
tube5.72e-10194
skeletal muscle tissue7.60e-1061
striated muscle tissue7.60e-1061
myotome7.60e-1061
cardiovascular system9.00e-10110
anatomical space9.59e-10104
trunk region element9.78e-10107
muscle tissue1.07e-0963
musculature1.07e-0963
musculature of body1.07e-0963
circulatory system1.19e-09113
dermomyotome1.99e-0970
anatomical cavity3.91e-0970
renal system6.71e-0945
urinary system structure1.12e-0844
abdomen element1.22e-0855
abdominal segment element1.22e-0855
multilaminar epithelium2.43e-0882
intermediate mesoderm5.94e-0837
compound organ1.36e-0769
artery1.79e-0742
arterial blood vessel1.79e-0742
arterial system1.79e-0742
somite2.01e-0783
paraxial mesoderm2.01e-0783
presomitic mesoderm2.01e-0783
presumptive segmental plate2.01e-0783
trunk paraxial mesoderm2.01e-0783
presumptive paraxial mesoderm2.01e-0783
anatomical system3.21e-07625
kidney3.39e-0727
kidney mesenchyme3.39e-0727
kidney rudiment3.39e-0727
kidney field3.39e-0727
anatomical group5.22e-07626
body cavity5.52e-0746
systemic artery7.17e-0733
systemic arterial system7.17e-0733
body cavity or lining8.29e-0749
endothelium8.41e-0718
blood vessel endothelium8.41e-0718
cardiovascular system endothelium8.41e-0718
simple squamous epithelium8.81e-0722


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CEBPB#105147.971147625824820.0002476385788090830.00267845127715843
E2F1#186944.907389214879320.001724022357361790.0106409296720352
E2F4#187439.501045236463330.001850751034728270.0109259277212133
FOSL1#8061219.85678985818650.003677050009233230.0185574285258679
GATA3#2625427.2365163572061.81561517799785e-066.76493162950114e-05
GTF2B#2959431.94382993432429.59435337635006e-074.08323012336033e-05
GTF2F1#2962412.73966087675773.79492332235515e-050.000717094258844672
HEY1#2346244.040111043105710.00375304636917980.0185817962335626
HMGN3#932448.178547723350590.0002234570284440470.00247929763026324
HNF4A#3172423.13229036295373.48990320893214e-060.000115415453210153
HNF4G#3174428.75342252644681.46167379934821e-065.66020578161394e-05
IRF1#365947.63716375356390.0002938853996185490.00307176713878719
MAX#414946.452555509007120.0005767613195645490.00485112148296705
MXI1#460149.96157162875930.0001015224754950450.0014224451057455
NFYA#4800418.42558069983058.67100748407158e-060.000234305653461566
NR2C2#7182432.61461090524098.82887529809196e-073.81813212114876e-05
RXRA#6256420.07461713913336.1537798808435e-060.000182014901437387
SIN3A#2594245.408884726815140.001168172384885160.00795428059101714
SP1#666745.69838137814090.0009482606065333980.00683615582838003
SREBF1#6720447.00584944048832.04523668136926e-071.10047642331543e-05
SRF#6722413.79717826216782.75840773062708e-050.000583759564293741
TAF1#687243.343046285745290.008005664898701650.0321825880044458
TBP#690843.706770687096390.005296377814784350.0243892593738211
TCF7L2#6934410.77017656313737.42969445082454e-050.00115297155832045
ZNF263#1012748.221841637010680.0002187871180958320.0024855768331133



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.