Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1795

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:24, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1795_heart_skeletal_adipose_breast_left_bladder_tongue



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:80788415..80788426,+p@chr17:80788415..80788426
+
Hg19::chr2:1377813..1377827,+p4@TPO
Hg19::chr2:1377864..1377877,+p3@TPO
Hg19::chr6:168335436..168335450,+p@chr6:168335436..168335450
+
Hg19::chr6:168335523..168335538,+p@chr6:168335523..168335538
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism5.87e-66115
neural tube1.31e-1657
neural rod1.31e-1657
future spinal cord1.31e-1657
neural keel1.31e-1657
neurectoderm1.24e-1390
regional part of brain1.95e-1359
neural plate4.26e-1386
presumptive neural plate4.26e-1386
brain1.46e-1169
future brain1.46e-1169
central nervous system1.75e-1182
anterior neural tube1.98e-1042
regional part of nervous system6.85e-1094
nervous system6.85e-1094
anterior region of body8.71e-10129
craniocervical region8.71e-10129
brainstem1.15e-098
regional part of forebrain1.59e-0941
forebrain1.59e-0941
future forebrain1.59e-0941
organ7.67e-09511
gray matter3.14e-0834
brain grey matter3.14e-0834
telencephalon5.52e-0834
posterior neural tube6.40e-0815
chordal neural plate6.40e-0815
ectoderm1.60e-07173
presumptive ectoderm1.60e-07173
head1.94e-07123
regional part of telencephalon2.16e-0733
ectoderm-derived structure4.35e-07169
anatomical conduit5.92e-07241
anatomical cluster9.41e-07286
cerebral hemisphere9.42e-0732


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.