Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C583

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:33, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C583_CD14_Monocytederived_Basophils_CD14CD16_immature_Mast_CD34



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:80170310..80170313,+p@chr10:80170310..80170313
+
Hg19::chr11:76476813..76476816,+p@chr11:76476813..76476816
+
Hg19::chr12:133793193..133793194,+p@chr12:133793193..133793194
+
Hg19::chr19:10961151..10961183,+p@chr19:10961151..10961183
+
Hg19::chr19:55208119..55208134,+p1@LILRP1
Hg19::chr21:44259651..44259655,+p@chr21:44259651..44259655
+
Hg19::chr21:44259721..44259735,+p@chr21:44259721..44259735
+
Hg19::chr2:129283966..129283970,+p@chr2:129283966..129283970
+
Hg19::chr4:180401309..180401311,+p@chr4:180401309..180401311
+
Hg19::chr6:1148441..1148443,+p@chr6:1148441..1148443
+
Hg19::chr6:121899725..121899727,-p@chr6:121899725..121899727
-
Hg19::chr9:131446139..131446175,+p7@SET
Hg19::chrX:129812794..129812795,+p@chrX:129812794..129812795
+
Hg19::chrX:13397469..13397486,-p2@GPX1P1
Hg19::chrX:74494018..74494064,+p2@UPRT


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0004845uracil phosphoribosyltransferase activity0.00174653636327956
GO:0031057negative regulation of histone modification0.00174653636327956
GO:0035067negative regulation of histone acetylation0.00174653636327956
GO:0035065regulation of histone acetylation0.002619765985493
GO:0031056regulation of histone modification0.00314367291127999
GO:0006337nucleosome disassembly0.00374235758173423
GO:0031498chromatin disassembly0.00374235758173423
GO:0016573histone acetylation0.00851286095336034
GO:0042393histone binding0.00873088237650159
GO:0051053negative regulation of DNA metabolic process0.00995261980593135
GO:0006473protein amino acid acetylation0.00999994554258916
GO:0043624cellular protein complex disassembly0.0101830303727582
GO:0043241protein complex disassembly0.0101830303727582
GO:0032984macromolecular complex disassembly0.0101830303727582
GO:0043543protein amino acid acylation0.0101830303727582
GO:0004864protein phosphatase inhibitor activity0.0101830303727582
GO:0019212phosphatase inhibitor activity0.0101830303727582
GO:0008601protein phosphatase type 2A regulator activity0.0101830303727582
GO:0016570histone modification0.0118371805858375
GO:0051052regulation of DNA metabolic process0.0118371805858375
GO:0022411cellular component disassembly0.0118371805858375
GO:0016569covalent chromatin modification0.0118371805858375
GO:0051129negative regulation of cellular component organization and biogenesis0.0118371805858375
GO:0048471perinuclear region of cytoplasm0.0139593349389837
GO:0019888protein phosphatase regulator activity0.015893915627673
GO:0016763transferase activity, transferring pentosyl groups0.015893915627673
GO:0019208phosphatase regulator activity0.015893915627673
GO:0051128regulation of cellular component organization and biogenesis0.0186856225836495
GO:0051248negative regulation of protein metabolic process0.0187618361445914
GO:0006913nucleocytoplasmic transport0.0263069123921503
GO:0051169nuclear transport0.0263069123921503
GO:0006334nucleosome assembly0.0305351422457932
GO:0031497chromatin assembly0.0330825996670276
GO:0016568chromatin modification0.0336409583061555
GO:0006333chromatin assembly or disassembly0.0407053355428631
GO:0065004protein-DNA complex assembly0.0408738530891449
GO:0045934negative regulation of nucleobase, nucleoside, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolic process0.0449624921352273
GO:0006260DNA replication0.0486939394914341



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic stem cell2.19e-59172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.19e-59172
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell5.01e-56165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell5.01e-56165
hematopoietic cell1.52e-54182
leukocyte6.29e-53140
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell6.65e-46124
nongranular leukocyte9.25e-43119
myeloid cell4.42e-42112
common myeloid progenitor4.42e-42112
myeloid leukocyte2.75e-3576
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell4.54e-3471
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.73e-3370
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor3.67e-3165
monopoietic cell5.53e-3063
monocyte5.53e-3063
monoblast5.53e-3063
promonocyte5.53e-3063
classical monocyte5.81e-2845
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.35e-2742
mesenchymal cell2.35e-12358
lymphocyte4.20e-1253
common lymphoid progenitor4.20e-1253
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell6.73e-1252
connective tissue cell2.65e-11365
motile cell3.67e-10390
lymphocyte of B lineage1.44e-0724
pro-B cell1.44e-0724
stem cell2.09e-07444
multi fate stem cell9.41e-07430
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system3.10e-31102
blood island3.10e-31102
hemolymphoid system1.11e-29112
bone marrow8.90e-2980
bone element5.62e-2586
skeletal element4.54e-21101
skeletal system4.54e-21101
immune system6.29e-20115
connective tissue3.07e-10375
musculoskeletal system4.84e-07167


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.