Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4776

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:19, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4776_Endothelial_Dendritic_CD4_acute_Renal_Hepatic_CD8



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr8:8204806..8204818,-p@chr8:8204806..8204818
-
Hg19::chr8:8204819..8204835,-p@chr8:8204819..8204835
-
Hg19::chr8:8204841..8204858,-p@chr8:8204841..8204858
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic stem cell1.19e-23172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.19e-23172
hematopoietic cell2.26e-21182
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.36e-20165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.36e-20165
leukocyte1.40e-20140
endothelial cell2.34e-2035
nongranular leukocyte8.78e-20119
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.23e-18124
endothelial cell of vascular tree3.31e-1724
meso-epithelial cell1.54e-1344
blood vessel endothelial cell1.74e-1318
embryonic blood vessel endothelial progenitor cell1.74e-1318
lymphocyte9.77e-1153
common lymphoid progenitor9.77e-1153
myeloid cell1.77e-10112
common myeloid progenitor1.77e-10112
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.91e-1052
mature alpha-beta T cell6.62e-1018
alpha-beta T cell6.62e-1018
immature T cell6.62e-1018
mature T cell6.62e-1018
immature alpha-beta T cell6.62e-1018
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.06e-0970
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.91e-0971
myeloid leukocyte1.07e-0876
monopoietic cell1.56e-0863
monocyte1.56e-0863
monoblast1.56e-0863
promonocyte1.56e-0863
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor7.98e-0865
endothelial cell of artery2.09e-079
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell4.46e-0711
T cell4.97e-0725
pro-T cell4.97e-0725


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.