Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1648

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:30, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1648_Adipocyte_Ciliary_Endothelial_Smooth_aorta_kidney_hepatic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:89224488..89224507,-p3@NOX4
Hg19::chr11:89224508..89224563,-p1@NOX4
Hg19::chr11:89224580..89224594,-p4@NOX4
Hg19::chr11:89224638..89224649,-p6@NOX4
Hg19::chr11:89224667..89224681,-p2@NOX4


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
vasculature2.54e-3479
vascular system2.54e-3479
vessel5.62e-3169
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.73e-3084
blood vessel3.31e-2960
epithelial tube open at both ends3.31e-2960
blood vasculature3.31e-2960
vascular cord3.31e-2960
circulatory system3.20e-27113
cardiovascular system2.87e-26110
epithelial tube5.51e-22118
artery3.23e-1942
arterial blood vessel3.23e-1942
arterial system3.23e-1942
cell layer6.11e-19312
anatomical conduit8.96e-19241
anatomical cluster3.82e-18286
tube5.19e-18194
epithelium5.32e-18309
systemic artery2.35e-1533
systemic arterial system2.35e-1533
muscle tissue9.06e-1563
musculature9.06e-1563
musculature of body9.06e-1563
skeletal muscle tissue1.64e-1461
striated muscle tissue1.64e-1461
myotome1.64e-1461
multi-cellular organism3.24e-14659
somite3.30e-1483
paraxial mesoderm3.30e-1483
presomitic mesoderm3.30e-1483
presumptive segmental plate3.30e-1483
trunk paraxial mesoderm3.30e-1483
presumptive paraxial mesoderm3.30e-1483
dermomyotome4.99e-1470
endothelium8.09e-1418
blood vessel endothelium8.09e-1418
cardiovascular system endothelium8.09e-1418
unilaminar epithelium1.81e-13138
organism subdivision1.20e-12365
multilaminar epithelium1.02e-1182
aorta1.90e-1121
aortic system1.90e-1121
simple squamous epithelium1.11e-1022
multi-tissue structure1.42e-10347
trunk mesenchyme5.40e-10143
anatomical system8.89e-10625
anatomical group1.30e-09626
squamous epithelium7.65e-0925
compound organ2.81e-0869
trunk3.73e-08216
pigment epithelium of eye1.09e-0711
endothelial tube1.36e-079
arterial system endothelium1.36e-079
endothelium of artery1.36e-079
embryo1.42e-07612
primary circulatory organ2.50e-0727
smooth muscle tissue9.50e-0715


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.