Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2399

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:23, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2399_brain_pineal_occipital_cerebellum_temporal_duodenum_parietal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:31620303..31620320,-p1@ACCN1
Hg19::chr19:49014832..49014869,-p2@AB384647
Hg19::chr1:18434245..18434256,+p2@IGSF21
Hg19::chr1:18434257..18434308,+p1@IGSF21


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0015280amiloride-sensitive sodium channel activity0.0356123250594787
GO:0007422peripheral nervous system development0.0388423745517936



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism4.30e-69115
regional part of nervous system5.79e-4794
nervous system5.79e-4794
central nervous system1.17e-4582
neural tube9.60e-4157
neural rod9.60e-4157
future spinal cord9.60e-4157
neural keel9.60e-4157
brain1.69e-3669
future brain1.69e-3669
neurectoderm4.75e-3690
regional part of brain3.36e-3459
neural plate1.69e-3386
presumptive neural plate1.69e-3386
anterior neural tube5.71e-3142
regional part of forebrain2.20e-3041
forebrain2.20e-3041
future forebrain2.20e-3041
telencephalon6.26e-2534
gray matter7.37e-2534
brain grey matter7.37e-2534
ectoderm1.90e-24173
presumptive ectoderm1.90e-24173
regional part of telencephalon4.88e-2433
pre-chordal neural plate1.08e-2361
cerebral hemisphere1.78e-2332
ectoderm-derived structure1.88e-22169
anterior region of body2.20e-21129
craniocervical region2.20e-21129
regional part of cerebral cortex1.21e-2022
head7.84e-20123
neocortex5.40e-1920
cerebral cortex4.36e-1825
pallium4.36e-1825
posterior neural tube1.07e-1015
chordal neural plate1.07e-1015
tube3.22e-09194
segmental subdivision of nervous system4.59e-0913
segmental subdivision of hindbrain1.87e-0812
hindbrain1.87e-0812
presumptive hindbrain1.87e-0812
basal ganglion2.55e-089
nuclear complex of neuraxis2.55e-089
aggregate regional part of brain2.55e-089
collection of basal ganglia2.55e-089
cerebral subcortex2.55e-089
nucleus of brain3.11e-089
neural nucleus3.11e-089
temporal lobe6.27e-087
brainstem2.11e-078
organ part2.76e-07219
anatomical conduit3.78e-07241
diencephalon7.46e-077
future diencephalon7.46e-077
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
neuroectodermal tumor6.34e-0710


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.