Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2295

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:22, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2295_CD4_CD8_cerebellum_Small_pituitary_Mast_cord



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr14:45553296..45553340,+p1@PRPF39
Hg19::chr15:101142365..101142395,-p1@LINS
Hg19::chr3:56591184..56591255,+p1@CCDC66
Hg19::chr5:64859094..64859136,+p1@PPWD1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0008380RNA splicing0.00102948989227113
GO:0006397mRNA processing0.00102948989227113
GO:0016071mRNA metabolic process0.00107790320168466
GO:0006396RNA processing0.0019070019214864
GO:0003755peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase activity0.0291609777648741
GO:0016859cis-trans isomerase activity0.0291609777648741
GO:0005681spliceosome0.0373329756484199



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.04e-25115
neural tube8.95e-1857
neural rod8.95e-1857
future spinal cord8.95e-1857
neural keel8.95e-1857
regional part of forebrain7.37e-1641
forebrain7.37e-1641
future forebrain7.37e-1641
anterior neural tube1.27e-1542
central nervous system1.28e-1582
regional part of nervous system3.27e-1594
nervous system3.27e-1594
regional part of brain2.98e-1459
brain4.74e-1469
future brain4.74e-1469
gray matter9.09e-1334
brain grey matter9.09e-1334
telencephalon1.46e-1234
regional part of telencephalon2.77e-1233
cerebral hemisphere8.16e-1232
neurectoderm6.77e-1090
regional part of cerebral cortex2.82e-0922
neural plate3.45e-0986
presumptive neural plate3.45e-0986
cerebral cortex8.70e-0925
pallium8.70e-0925
neocortex2.47e-0820
pre-chordal neural plate1.86e-0761
anterior region of body6.90e-07129
craniocervical region6.90e-07129
blood8.29e-0715
haemolymphatic fluid8.29e-0715
organism substance8.29e-0715


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.