Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4452

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:45, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4452_Lens_Mesenchymal_osteoclastoma_Preadipocyte_basal_Fibroblast_epithelioid



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr5:121412802..121412811,-p12@LOX
Hg19::chr5:121412820..121412842,-p6@LOX
Hg19::chr5:121412855..121412875,-p8@LOX


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
vasculature1.96e-1978
vascular system1.96e-1978
epithelial vesicle1.49e-1778
unilaminar epithelium2.98e-17148
somite4.90e-1771
presomitic mesoderm4.90e-1771
presumptive segmental plate4.90e-1771
dermomyotome4.90e-1771
trunk paraxial mesoderm4.90e-1771
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.20e-1683
dense mesenchyme tissue1.78e-1673
paraxial mesoderm2.23e-1672
presumptive paraxial mesoderm2.23e-1672
vessel2.03e-1568
cardiovascular system2.17e-15109
skeletal muscle tissue1.65e-1462
striated muscle tissue1.65e-1462
myotome1.65e-1462
circulatory system2.39e-14112
multilaminar epithelium4.21e-1483
muscle tissue9.03e-1464
musculature9.03e-1464
musculature of body9.03e-1464
epithelial tube open at both ends1.25e-1359
blood vessel1.25e-1359
blood vasculature1.25e-1359
vascular cord1.25e-1359
epithelial tube3.34e-13117
mesenchyme4.30e-13160
entire embryonic mesenchyme4.30e-13160
trunk mesenchyme5.04e-13122
artery1.10e-1142
arterial blood vessel1.10e-1142
arterial system1.10e-1142
organism subdivision3.40e-11264
trunk1.26e-09199
systemic artery4.25e-0933
systemic arterial system4.25e-0933
surface structure3.60e-0899
cell layer5.65e-08309
integument6.41e-0846
integumental system6.41e-0846
epithelium2.06e-07306
multi-cellular organism5.52e-07656
skin of body5.63e-0741


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.