Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3190

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:58, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3190_papillary_leiomyoma_mesothelioma_meningioma_myxofibrosarcoma_squamous_Preadipocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:65660338..65660366,-p@chr11:65660338..65660366
-
Hg19::chr11:65660519..65660553,-p@chr11:65660519..65660553
-
Hg19::chr11:65660606..65660635,-p@chr11:65660606..65660635
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
surface structure4.42e-1099
unilaminar epithelium5.91e-10148
multilaminar epithelium9.22e-1083
epithelial vesicle9.73e-1078
artery1.61e-0942
arterial blood vessel1.61e-0942
arterial system1.61e-0942
mesoderm2.19e-09315
mesoderm-derived structure2.19e-09315
presumptive mesoderm2.19e-09315
anatomical system2.51e-09624
anatomical group4.08e-09625
organism subdivision6.57e-09264
trunk8.19e-09199
epithelial tube open at both ends9.24e-0959
blood vessel9.24e-0959
blood vasculature9.24e-0959
vascular cord9.24e-0959
vessel1.29e-0868
vasculature1.31e-0878
vascular system1.31e-0878
epithelial tube1.81e-08117
somite4.05e-0871
presomitic mesoderm4.05e-0871
presumptive segmental plate4.05e-0871
dermomyotome4.05e-0871
trunk paraxial mesoderm4.05e-0871
systemic artery4.72e-0833
systemic arterial system4.72e-0833
dense mesenchyme tissue6.78e-0873
paraxial mesoderm1.08e-0772
presumptive paraxial mesoderm1.08e-0772
musculoskeletal system1.42e-07167
trunk mesenchyme2.19e-07122
integument2.43e-0746
integumental system2.43e-0746
multi-cellular organism3.45e-07656
skin of body6.06e-0741


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
SIX5#147912211.3911435703060.009873820081429030.037059293304261



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.