Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1067

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:39, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1067_ductus_salivary_smooth_submaxillary_medial_parotid_seminal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:239549856..239549887,+p1@CHRM3
Hg19::chr1:239549889..239549900,+p5@CHRM3
Hg19::chr1:239549933..239549960,+p2@CHRM3
Hg19::chr1:239549963..239549974,+p6@CHRM3
Hg19::chr1:239550009..239550033,+p4@CHRM3
Hg19::chr1:239550209..239550229,+p8@CHRM3
Hg19::chr1:239550243..239550304,+p3@CHRM3
Hg19::chr1:239872062..239872067,+p@chr1:239872062..239872067
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism7.71e-53114
central nervous system4.55e-4181
brain3.82e-3968
future brain3.82e-3968
nervous system6.15e-3889
neural tube4.11e-3756
neural rod4.11e-3756
future spinal cord4.11e-3756
neural keel4.11e-3756
regional part of nervous system3.05e-3653
regional part of brain3.05e-3653
regional part of forebrain4.36e-3541
forebrain4.36e-3541
anterior neural tube4.36e-3541
future forebrain4.36e-3541
cerebral hemisphere1.97e-3332
telencephalon5.57e-3334
brain grey matter9.77e-3334
gray matter9.77e-3334
regional part of cerebral cortex3.10e-3122
organ system subdivision4.61e-31223
regional part of telencephalon7.48e-3132
neocortex9.23e-2920
cerebral cortex1.36e-2625
pallium1.36e-2625
neural plate5.29e-2482
presumptive neural plate5.29e-2482
pre-chordal neural plate2.01e-2361
neurectoderm3.66e-2286
ectoderm-derived structure2.80e-18171
ectoderm2.80e-18171
presumptive ectoderm2.80e-18171
ecto-epithelium1.57e-17104
anatomical cluster1.19e-16373
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest8.64e-16132
multi-tissue structure7.80e-12342
organ2.75e-11503
temporal lobe1.89e-106
gyrus1.42e-096
multi-cellular organism2.99e-09656
embryo1.26e-08592
anatomical conduit1.51e-08240
basal ganglion2.15e-089
nuclear complex of neuraxis2.15e-089
aggregate regional part of brain2.15e-089
collection of basal ganglia2.15e-089
cerebral subcortex2.15e-089
occipital lobe3.25e-085
limbic system5.40e-085
parietal lobe7.75e-085
neural nucleus1.11e-079
nucleus of brain1.11e-079
anatomical system1.44e-07624
anatomical group1.68e-07625
brainstem3.29e-076
developing anatomical structure5.26e-07581
tube5.90e-07192
embryonic structure9.36e-07564


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066474.690224326440655.26249365325459e-050.00089367410512562
HDAC2#306658.384762647891410.000106287309381870.00148105941354678
RAD21#588579.060654658524295.73112922357867e-072.63796123834876e-05
REST#597878.443775126612029.32603392806583e-073.99836476770635e-05
ZNF263#1012777.194111432384342.81251959700937e-069.71994487730183e-05



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.