Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3450

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:07, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3450_teratocarcinoma_iPS_H9_HES3GFP_extraskeletal_testicular_testis



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr14:74815204..74815217,+p2@VRTN
Hg19::chr19:15344243..15344265,-p2@EPHX3
Hg19::chr20:6798842..6798850,+p@chr20:6798842..6798850
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
embryonic stem cell9.01e-565
neuron1.21e-176
neuroblast1.21e-176
electrically signaling cell1.21e-176
germ line cell1.03e-147
germ cell1.03e-147
neuronal stem cell2.20e-138
melanocyte1.13e-1010
melanoblast1.13e-1010
pigment cell9.03e-0814
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
testis4.42e-228
male reproductive organ3.78e-1611
tonsil4.31e-121
mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue4.31e-121
lymphoid tissue4.31e-121
tonsillar ring4.31e-121
gonad1.42e-0821
indifferent external genitalia1.42e-0821
indifferent gonad1.42e-0821
gonad primordium1.42e-0821
external genitalia3.43e-0822
male organism3.43e-0822
male reproductive system3.43e-0822
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
germ cell and embryonal cancer1.67e-1222
germ cell cancer1.67e-1222


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.