Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2611

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:14, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2611_Hepatic_heart_breast_Renal_spleen_Endothelial_acute



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr20:30598204..30598223,+p3@C20orf160
Hg19::chr20:30598231..30598260,+p2@C20orf160
Hg19::chr22:51111241..51111260,+p@chr22:51111241..51111260
+
Hg19::chr3:123751833..123751848,+p@chr3:123751833..123751848
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism2.22e-72114
neural tube7.62e-2756
neural rod7.62e-2756
future spinal cord7.62e-2756
neural keel7.62e-2756
anatomical conduit1.04e-26240
anatomical cluster6.16e-26373
regional part of nervous system1.03e-2453
regional part of brain1.03e-2453
tube2.71e-23192
regional part of forebrain6.19e-2241
forebrain6.19e-2241
anterior neural tube6.19e-2241
future forebrain6.19e-2241
neural plate8.33e-2182
presumptive neural plate8.33e-2182
blood vessel endothelium1.33e-2018
endothelium1.33e-2018
cardiovascular system endothelium1.33e-2018
central nervous system7.99e-2081
brain2.53e-1968
future brain2.53e-1968
neurectoderm3.97e-1986
brain grey matter1.78e-1734
gray matter1.78e-1734
nervous system2.38e-1789
telencephalon3.21e-1734
regional part of telencephalon5.35e-1632
cerebral hemisphere5.79e-1632
simple squamous epithelium1.06e-1522
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.91e-15132
pre-chordal neural plate2.00e-1461
ecto-epithelium3.69e-14104
regional part of cerebral cortex4.05e-1422
organ system subdivision3.73e-13223
squamous epithelium4.36e-1325
neocortex1.27e-1220
epithelium6.56e-12306
cerebral cortex8.15e-1225
pallium8.15e-1225
cell layer1.51e-11309
vessel2.84e-1168
multi-cellular organism4.78e-11656
endothelial tube8.66e-119
arterial system endothelium8.66e-119
endothelium of artery8.66e-119
anatomical system1.88e-09624
anatomical group2.26e-09625
multi-tissue structure3.42e-09342
vasculature3.47e-0978
vascular system3.47e-0978
lymphoid system5.90e-0910
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm3.15e-0883
ectoderm-derived structure4.33e-08171
ectoderm4.33e-08171
presumptive ectoderm4.33e-08171
circulatory system5.63e-08112
organ part6.18e-08218
embryo1.21e-07592
epithelial tube open at both ends1.38e-0759
blood vessel1.38e-0759
blood vasculature1.38e-0759
vascular cord1.38e-0759
lymphatic vessel1.96e-078
lymph vasculature1.96e-078
lymphatic part of lymphoid system1.96e-078
neural nucleus2.43e-079
nucleus of brain2.43e-079
embryonic structure4.17e-07564
germ layer5.44e-07560
germ layer / neural crest5.44e-07560
embryonic tissue5.44e-07560
presumptive structure5.44e-07560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure5.44e-07560
epiblast (generic)5.44e-07560
developing anatomical structure5.69e-07581
compound organ7.75e-0768


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.