Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1956

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:53, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1956_Fibroblast_mesothelioma_Mesothelial_pineal_Mallassezderived_mesenchymal_osteoclastoma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr5:167689852..167689867,+p@chr5:167689852..167689867
+
Hg19::chr5:167689880..167689926,+p@chr5:167689880..167689926
+
Hg19::chr5:167689978..167689992,+p@chr5:167689978..167689992
+
Hg19::chr5:167690090..167690143,+p@chr5:167690090..167690143
+
Hg19::chr5:167690700..167690720,+p@chr5:167690700..167690720
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
general ecto-epithelial cell1.94e-0814
skin fibroblast2.50e-0823
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
ecto-epithelium3.73e-29104
ectoderm-derived structure1.34e-25171
ectoderm1.34e-25171
presumptive ectoderm1.34e-25171
neurectoderm1.62e-2486
neural plate4.00e-2482
presumptive neural plate4.00e-2482
neural tube7.15e-2456
neural rod7.15e-2456
future spinal cord7.15e-2456
neural keel7.15e-2456
regional part of nervous system1.65e-2353
regional part of brain1.65e-2353
brain1.14e-2168
future brain1.14e-2168
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest3.62e-21132
central nervous system6.57e-2081
nervous system7.67e-2089
regional part of forebrain1.26e-1941
forebrain1.26e-1941
anterior neural tube1.26e-1941
future forebrain1.26e-1941
pre-chordal neural plate2.42e-1861
cerebral hemisphere4.50e-1832
brain grey matter8.90e-1834
gray matter8.90e-1834
telencephalon1.38e-1734
regional part of telencephalon1.03e-1632
regional part of cerebral cortex1.58e-1622
neocortex1.12e-1420
cerebral cortex1.00e-1325
pallium1.00e-1325
adult organism1.49e-11114
organ4.17e-11503
skin of body5.80e-1141
surface structure4.01e-0999
integument7.43e-0946
integumental system7.43e-0946
organ system subdivision5.04e-08223
organ part1.07e-07218
anatomical system5.49e-07624
multi-cellular organism6.15e-07656
anatomical group6.63e-07625
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
musculoskeletal system disease9.71e-075
myotonic disease9.71e-075
muscle tissue disease9.71e-075
myopathy9.71e-075
muscular disease9.71e-075
myotonic dystrophy9.71e-075


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.