Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3075

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:56, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3075_Endothelial_Renal_Smooth_Fibroblast_Mesothelial_Hepatic_Lymphatic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:103495901..103495904,-p@chr11:103495901..103495904
-
Hg19::chr14:75422409..75422422,+p@chr14:75422409..75422422
+
Hg19::chr7:134779508..134779514,-p@chr7:134779508..134779514
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
vessel6.14e-3069
vasculature6.46e-2879
vascular system6.46e-2879
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.02e-2584
endothelium6.18e-2518
blood vessel endothelium6.18e-2518
cardiovascular system endothelium6.18e-2518
simple squamous epithelium4.26e-2422
cardiovascular system7.83e-24110
blood vessel7.91e-2460
epithelial tube open at both ends7.91e-2460
blood vasculature7.91e-2460
vascular cord7.91e-2460
circulatory system1.07e-22113
epithelial tube2.40e-22118
squamous epithelium2.76e-2025
anatomical conduit6.44e-18241
tube1.65e-16194
unilaminar epithelium1.31e-15138
artery1.54e-1542
arterial blood vessel1.54e-1542
arterial system1.54e-1542
cell layer1.87e-15312
anatomical cluster6.43e-15286
epithelium7.27e-15309
endothelial tube9.67e-149
arterial system endothelium9.67e-149
endothelium of artery9.67e-149
systemic artery1.03e-1033
systemic arterial system1.03e-1033
lymphatic vessel8.01e-098
lymph vasculature8.01e-098
lymphatic part of lymphoid system8.01e-098
aorta1.49e-0721
aortic system1.49e-0721
anatomical system6.21e-07625
anatomical group7.24e-07626


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.