Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4731

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:52, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4731_granulocyte_acute_osteosarcoma_thymus_smallcell_hippocampus_serous



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr8:144450985..144451002,+p3@RHPN1
Hg19::chr8:144451007..144451031,+p2@RHPN1
Hg19::chr8:144451039..144451054,+p1@RHPN1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell6.30e-10254
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube4.18e-2057
neural rod4.18e-2057
future spinal cord4.18e-2057
neural keel4.18e-2057
adult organism6.77e-18115
central nervous system1.74e-1782
anterior neural tube3.74e-1742
regional part of forebrain4.36e-1741
forebrain4.36e-1741
future forebrain4.36e-1741
regional part of nervous system3.68e-1694
nervous system3.68e-1694
neurectoderm1.29e-1590
brain3.12e-1569
future brain3.12e-1569
regional part of brain9.10e-1559
neural plate1.04e-1486
presumptive neural plate1.04e-1486
gray matter2.67e-1434
brain grey matter2.67e-1434
telencephalon2.87e-1434
regional part of telencephalon7.88e-1433
cerebral hemisphere3.28e-1332
pre-chordal neural plate1.42e-1261
cerebral cortex9.44e-1025
pallium9.44e-1025
regional part of cerebral cortex9.75e-1022
neocortex1.04e-0820
anterior region of body4.82e-07129
craniocervical region4.82e-07129
trunk region element6.79e-07107
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma2.24e-18106
cell type cancer1.18e-15143
cancer1.53e-11235
disease of cellular proliferation1.32e-10239
adenocarcinoma5.19e-0925


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.