Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3795

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:21, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3795_lens_Olfactory_mesenchymal_leiomyoma_Fibroblast_mesothelioma_papillary



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr19:41727090..41727118,+p@chr19:41727090..41727118
+
Hg19::chr19:41727775..41727794,+p@chr19:41727775..41727794
+
Hg19::chr19:41727873..41727889,+p@chr19:41727873..41727889
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial vesicle1.32e-1278
epithelial tube1.81e-12117
mesenchyme6.12e-12160
entire embryonic mesenchyme6.12e-12160
organism subdivision1.97e-11264
unilaminar epithelium2.37e-11148
cell layer7.34e-11309
trunk mesenchyme1.11e-10122
dense mesenchyme tissue2.52e-1073
epithelium3.09e-10306
multi-tissue structure5.55e-10342
somite5.70e-1071
presomitic mesoderm5.70e-1071
presumptive segmental plate5.70e-1071
dermomyotome5.70e-1071
trunk paraxial mesoderm5.70e-1071
paraxial mesoderm5.79e-1072
presumptive paraxial mesoderm5.79e-1072
epithelial tube open at both ends1.39e-0959
blood vessel1.39e-0959
blood vasculature1.39e-0959
vascular cord1.39e-0959
multilaminar epithelium1.52e-0983
vasculature2.05e-0978
vascular system2.05e-0978
surface structure2.52e-0999
artery3.62e-0942
arterial blood vessel3.62e-0942
arterial system3.62e-0942
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm3.86e-0983
trunk5.71e-09199
vessel3.07e-0868
excretory tube1.53e-0716
kidney epithelium1.53e-0716
skeletal muscle tissue1.55e-0762
striated muscle tissue1.55e-0762
myotome1.55e-0762
muscle tissue2.63e-0764
musculature2.63e-0764
musculature of body2.63e-0764
nephron epithelium2.85e-0715
renal tubule2.85e-0715
nephron tubule2.85e-0715
nephron2.85e-0715
uriniferous tubule2.85e-0715
nephrogenic mesenchyme2.85e-0715
organ component layer3.99e-0766
systemic artery4.35e-0733
systemic arterial system4.35e-0733
anatomical cluster4.62e-07373
organ part9.64e-07218


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.